I have the following for the data for the meta-analysis:
OR , standard errors, logged OR , variance of logged OR
I have generated a forest plots first using "OR" with "variance of logged OR" using jamovi software, the results were as expected and significant. then I realized that it may be wrong to do that and then I plotted again but using "OR" with "standard error" , what I have noticed that results were about the same and that the confidence intervals were slightly wider when I used the "variance of logged OR" .
so that I wonder if its correct to generate forest plot using "variance of logged OR" with "OR" ?