7
$\begingroup$

Let $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n$ be a random sample from a normal distribution with mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. Consider the problem of estimating $P(X > 100)$.

One way to accomplish this is to calculate $n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^n \mathbb{1}(X_i > 100) $. This "plug-in" estimator is consistent, and its bias and MSE are easy to compute.

A smaller group of my students came up with another way to approach the problem: calculate $$ 1 - \Phi\left(\frac{100 - \bar{x}}{s} \right). $$ This can be motivated by the fact that $P(X > 100) = 1 - \Phi[(100 - \mu)/\sigma].$ This estimator is also consistent, but its bias and MSE are more difficult to compute.

My question is this: does this kind of strategy have a name? I ask because we are still plugging things in, but this is not a so-called plug-in estimator.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Isn't this just the Gaussian MLE? $\endgroup$ – shadowtalker Oct 3 '18 at 3:40
  • $\begingroup$ @shadowtalker yeah it’d be the invariance principle if you were using the MLE for the variance, but we are not as long I define this sample variance as the one where you divide by $n-1$. $\endgroup$ – Taylor Oct 3 '18 at 3:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I would call the second one the "plug-in" estimator, while the first one is the moment estimator. $\endgroup$ – Xi'an Oct 4 '18 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ It's Rao-Blackwellized...but that isn't very specific $\endgroup$ – Taylor Oct 11 '18 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ The second method is much more powerful because it uses the distributional assumption of normality. However $\frac{100-\bar x}{s}$ is not normally distributed due to the uncertainty in $s$. Look up the $t$ distribution with $n$ degrees of freedom. $\endgroup$ – dave fournier Jan 27 '19 at 21:20
2
$\begingroup$

Your second estimator is the "plug-in" estimator, based on the invariance property of MLE's it is the maximum-likelihood estimator (under the normal assumptions). The first estimator could be called a moments estimator, but could also be seen as non-parametric, as it is unbiased without need for normality assumption.

So you could try to find a better unbiased estimator using Rao-Blackwell theorem.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks (+1) I'm not sure if you saw the discussion above, but I believe $s^2 = \sum_i(x_i - \bar{x})^2/(n-1)$ is not the MLE for iid normal data. $\endgroup$ – Taylor Jan 27 '19 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, so replace with $n$ as divisor. Rao-Blackwellization at least can be done approximately by simulation, exact calculation I am not so sure ... $\endgroup$ – kjetil b halvorsen Jan 28 '19 at 1:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.