2
$\begingroup$

Applying the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) is an inherent assumption in multinomial logistic regression but not binomial. Is it therefore okay and possibly better to use $K$ binomial logistic regression models instead of multinomial logistic regression when handing a multiclass classification problem with $K$ classes? Is this approach typically employed or not for any reasons in any scenarios (e.g. predicting elections)?

The primary concern I can think of is interpretation of probabilities. The $K$ binomial logistic regression models would allow one to understand the relative probabilities of class $A$ versus not class $A$, but would not have easy comparison of the probability of class $A$ versus class $B$. To compare the probabilities, some kind of alternative method (e.g. apply softmax function) would have to be employed, but perhaps this is just as misguided as the IIA assumption.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

I'm not 100% sure of this but I think that would you suggest is correct, finding the probability between classes would be difficult. I don't understand the softmax function you suggested since logistic regression is binary. You're exaggerating binary outputs.

To my knowledge (which isn't much because multinomial logistic regression was never touched on in my studies), how Multinomial LR works is already how you are describing your multi class logistic regression works.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Multinomial logistic regression provides exactly the same regression coefficients as fitting all binary logistic models against a single reference level of Y. The standard errors may be different, but multinomial (polytomous) logistic regression makes the same assumptions as a series of binary logistic regressions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.