5
$\begingroup$

In a video lecture, MrProf shows the 3d-plot of a bivariate normal distribution $\mu_{x_1} = \mu_{x_2} = \sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = 1$ and chooses $\rho = 0.5$ .

If stick to Mathworld, $\rho$ simply is the Pearson correlation that is $\dfrac{\mbox{cov}(x_1, x_2) }{[ \mbox{var}(x_1) \mbox{var}(x_2)]^\frac{1}{2}}$.

I don't understand why one would have control over $\rho$ as in the example given by MrProf. I understood that $\rho$ is an output from the formula as I plug in $x_1$ and $x_2$, not an input.

Can anyone throw any light?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
6
$\begingroup$

You need $\rho$ to account for how correlated the variables are.

If you had actual data, then $\rho$ would be output. But here MrProf is simulating data, so it is input. Just like, if you had actual data, $\mu$ and $\sigma$ would be output, but in order to simulate data, they are input.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ i had this distinction between real data and simulated ones on my mind, but i was not sure it actually is my answer thank you Peter $\endgroup$
    – tagoma
    Sep 21, 2012 at 12:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We're glad to help, @edouard, that's what CV is for. If Peter has provided the information you needed, you might consider accepting his answer by clicking on the check mark to the left underneath the vote total. $\endgroup$
    – gung - Reinstate Monica
    Sep 21, 2012 at 12:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.