1
$\begingroup$

I'm currently on a university assignment where I'm stuck more or less in the middle. I have to answer the following problem:

Suppose you are interested in estimating the production function for agricultural output (as in the seminal article Mundlak 1961). You have access to data for a large number of farms $i$ for $T \geq 1$ time periods. The production function you want to estimate is:

\begin{equation} y_{it} = x_{it}\beta + \alpha_i + \epsilon_{it} \end{equation}

where $y_{it}$ is log-output, $x_{it}$ is log-labour (a variable input), $\alpha_i$ is log-soil-quality (a fixed input) and $\epsilon_{it}$ is rainfall (a random input). Each farmer knows the price of output $P_t$, the wage rate $W_t$, and the soil quality of his farm $\alpha_i$. However, as the econometrician you only observe ($y_{it}$, $x_{it}$). Assume that $\epsilon_{it}\sim \text{IID Dist}$ and independent of everything else in the model.

Solve the farmer’s profit maximization problem assuming he sells output at a common (across farmers) market price $P_t$ and pays common wages $W_t$. (Hint: It may help to write down the production function in levels instead of logs.) For notational convenience, assume $\mathbb{E}(e{^{\epsilon_{it}}}) = \lambda$. Does the labor demand depend on $\alpha_i$? Explain the economic intuition behind the result.

Would anyone give me some hints on how to tackle this task? Extremely glad for any help!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What have you done so far? Where are you getting stuck? $\endgroup$ – Frank Nov 29 '18 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ (Also, this question is better suited for Economics StackExchange) $\endgroup$ – Frank Nov 29 '18 at 15:57
  • $\begingroup$ So far I assumed that I have to set up the profit maximization. So: $y_{it}*P_t - x_{it}*W_t$ and differentiate with respect to $x_{it}$. However I don't see where to include the hint. $\endgroup$ – rbonac Nov 29 '18 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ The hint is relevant because the firm makes $P_t$ on one unit of output (not log output) and pays $W_t$ on one unit of labor (not log labor). $\endgroup$ – Frank Nov 29 '18 at 16:02
  • $\begingroup$ So if we differentiate with repsect to $x$, $\alpha_i$ is equal to 0 since it's a constant. So the labor demand does not depend on $\alpha_i$? I don't get the effect of $Ee{^{\epsilon_{it}}} = \lambda$ in this problem. $\endgroup$ – rbonac Nov 29 '18 at 16:06
1
$\begingroup$

The hint tells you to transform to level instead of log ...

$$y_{it} = x_{it}\beta + \alpha_i + \epsilon_{it}$$ is log of the production function. So production must be

$$Y_{it} = A_iX_{it}^\beta\cdot u_{it}$$

found by taking exponential $$\exp(y_{it}) = \exp(x_{it}\beta + \alpha_i + \epsilon_{it})$$

and defining $Y_{it} = exp(y_{it})$ $X_{it}=\exp(x_{it})$ and $A_i = \exp(\alpha_i)$ and $u_{it} = \exp(\epsilon_{it})$.

Profit max problem is then

$$ \max_{X_{it}}\Pi_{it} = P_t A_iX_{it}^\beta\cdot u_{it} - W_t X_{it} $$

Given the iid character of $\epsilon_{it}$ and the farmers knowledge the expected profit is the same with $\mathbb E[u_{it}]$ substituted for $u_{it}$:

$$ \max_{X_{it}}\mathbb E [\Pi_{it}] = P_t A_iX_{it}^\beta\cdot \mathbb E [u_{it}] - W_t X_{it} $$

The solution for labour demand is $$X_{it}^\star= \left(\frac{P_tA_i \mathbb E [u_{it}] }{W_t}\right)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}$$ higher price, soil quality and expected rainfall are all expected to increase marginal revenue of labor and therfore increase labor demand for a given wage.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That makes sense, thanks a lot for your help! Unfortunately I could not upvote your comment since my reputation is too low. $\endgroup$ – rbonac Nov 30 '18 at 11:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.