2
$\begingroup$

For two probability measures $\mu$ and $\nu$, the Wassertein Distance is defined as $$W_p (\mu , \nu) = \left[ \inf\limits_{\gamma \in \Gamma} |x-y|^p \, d\gamma (x,y) \right] ^{\frac{1}{p}} \, , $$ where $\Gamma$ is the set of all measures $\gamma $ for which $\mu$ and $\nu$ are marginals.

This is a highly non-constructive definition. So, given two sample sets, say $x_1 , \ldots , x_n$ iid from $\mu$ and $y_1 , \ldots , y_n$ from $\nu$, it is not at all obvious how to estimate $W_p (\mu , \nu)$, or even how to compute the distance between the empirical distribution.

Question: Given iid samples from $\mu$ and $\nu$, how does one compute the distance between the empirical distributions?

What is known? In the special case of $p=1$, $W_1 (\mu , \nu) = \int_{-\infty} ^{\infty} |F_{\mu}(y) - F_{\nu}(y)| \, dy$, where $F_{\mu}$ and $F_{\nu}$ are the CDFs of the respective measures. The proof can be easily extended to show that $W_p ^p (\mu , \nu) = \int_{-\infty} ^{\infty} |F_{\mu}(y) - F_{\nu}(y)|^p \, dy$, but not to an equality.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ – Alex R. Dec 11 '18 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexR. Thanks, but isn't EMD just $W_1$? $\endgroup$ – Amir Sagiv Dec 11 '18 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ If I'm not mistaken, it can be $W_p$, as it's a discretization of Wasserstein distance to a histogram. The distance function $d_{ij}$ is arbitrary, and can refer to any norm. $\endgroup$ – Alex R. Dec 11 '18 at 23:50

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.