1
$\begingroup$

Im working on a linear regression with 3 independent variables (likert scales from 0-6) nothing out of the ordinary.

The IDs correlate from r=.3 to .58 with each other, which is a bit high although the VIF is still under 2. So usually I would assume that the multicollinieraty assumption would be ok here, but I mean-centered to IDs just to see what happens.

After centering, all IDs perfectly correlate with each other, which I dont know if thats an centering artifact or not. Also the VIF is now 1 which seems weird and the regression analysis throws out the 2nd and 3rd ID even when I forced SPSS (method enter) to consider them in the regression.

Any idea what I did wrong here?

Cheers

$\endgroup$
0
3
$\begingroup$

If you multiply random variables by constants and add other constants, this will not affect correlation between them. Below you can find a picture-proof for this claim. It comes from this answer by me that proves that the opposite is also not true.

enter image description here

So I guess, there must be some kind of bug in your code.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, exactly. I checked a scatter plot all values are in a straight diagonal line, so there must be something wrong. The center operation is so simple that i cant figure out what wrong. Also the raw data still makes sense. Although im just noticing that my 2 of the 3 IDs have a disctly non zero mean... $\endgroup$ – Sungod3k Dec 22 '18 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ Got it. Was indeed a syntax error. It used only one ID to calculate all of the centered varibles. $\endgroup$ – Sungod3k Dec 22 '18 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Sungod3k so I guess you can mark it as solved. $\endgroup$ – Tim Dec 22 '18 at 14:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.