0
$\begingroup$

i have this question in one of the past exams . Discuss which model you would choose to calculate the probability of default of corporate firms and give a rationale for including OR excluding the RE/TA and ME/TL from the model. firms.
Model A: Constant WC/TA RE/TA EBIT/TA ME/TL S/TA Coefficient -5.14 1.41 -1.26 -9.46 -0.66 2.8 Standard error of the coefficient 0.32 1.42 0.38 3.68 0.34 0.72 p-value 0 0.32 0 0.01 0.05 0

Where: WC/TA is Working capital/Total assets RE/TA is Retained earnings/Total assets EBIT/TA is Earnings before interest and taxes/Total assets ME/TL is market value of equity/Total liabilities S/TA is Sales/Total assets The Pseudo-R2 for this model is 33% and the Likelihood Ratio (LR) test is 122, which is significant at the 1% level. The insignificant factors RE/TA and ME/TL are removed from Model A and the following logit model is produced. Model B: Constant WC/TA EBIT/TA S/TA Coefficient -4.69 -1.26 -4.73 -0.32 Standard error of the coefficient 0.26 0.36 4.93 0.25 p-value 0 0 0.34 0.2

The Pseudo-R2 for this model is 28% and the Likelihood Ratio (LR) test is 106, which is significant at the 1% level. A Likelihood Ratio (LR) test is calculated to compare the log-likelihood of the two models. The LR value is calculated as 15.5 with a p-value of 0.0%.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please tidy the format of this question - it is very hard to read. You can upload pictures if it helps. $\endgroup$ – André.B Jan 8 at 22:00

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.