I have a multiple response categorical variable (MRCV) and a single response categorical variable (SRCV). Respondents in my survey were presented with 6 choices (6 barriers to access an application) and were asked to check all that apply. Respondents were healthcare providers so I have physicians, nurses, pharmacists and dentists (4 levels). I wish to answer the following questions:

  1. Do the number of barriers selected differ among provider levels? I am thinking about the following procedures:

    • calculate the mean number of barriers per provider level and do a one-way ANOVA.
    • sum the barriers per subject and do a Poisson regression with provider as predictor.
    • consider the 6 choices as 6 questions (dichotomous) and do a generalized linear mixed model with binomial link function and respondent id as random factor.

I am wondering if the above analyses are answering the same question.

  1. Do the distribution of barriers differ among the provider levels? I already found an analysis to answer this question. The method is called Test for Marginal Independence and is available in MRCV package in R. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2014/RJ-2014-014/RJ-2014-014.pdf

  2. This is my main question. Can we able to quantify in terms of odds ratio or probability to say a provider group (E.g. physicians) are more likely to have selected a particular barrier compared to another provider (E.g. nurses). I couldn't find any regression model to answer this question. Any help on this is greatly appreciated.

  • $\begingroup$ For Q3 do you want to do each barrier separately? $\endgroup$ – mdewey Jan 11 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ I should have asked that question. Can we do a binomial regression independently for each barrier or does it violate any assumptions given the nature of multi-select question? I am going through the MRCV package and found an example I think that can answer my Q3. If you look at help(MI.TEST) (requires MRCV package) and go to the last example, they used a gee model on data similar to mine. Can you please check it and tell me if I can proceed with this model. $\endgroup$ – novice Jan 11 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ I see no reason, if they are at liberty to check as many barriers as they please, why you cannot analyse each separately, presumably with logistic regression. $\endgroup$ – mdewey Jan 11 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your suggestion @mdewey. I will go with logistic regression. As for Q1, is there any difference between the three methods? $\endgroup$ – novice Jan 11 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ I would have thought ordinal logistic regression might be better than either of your first 2 and I do not immediately see what your third one would do. $\endgroup$ – mdewey Jan 11 at 17:03

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.