In OLS regression, what does a one unit change in X represent in terms of a beta-related change in Y when the outcome variable has been transformed to $1/\sqrt(Y)$?

(Transformation was done to ensure linearity in the model. My predictor variables are 0-1 dummies.)

I've consulted the following useful posts, but I still don't know what is the answer:


Back-transformation of regression coefficients

How to interpret regression coefficients when response was transformed by the 4th root?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ One of those links you reference shows how to deal with the fourth root. What part of it are you having trouble adapting to the reciprocal square root? $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Oct 5, 2012 at 19:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply, whuber. This is the part where my math skills are wanting: $\endgroup$
    – Argi
    Commented Oct 5, 2012 at 22:35
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, here is the quote: "These changes are the derivatives dY/dX i , which the Chain Rule tells us are equal to 4β i Y 3 . We would plug in the estimates, then, and say something like The regression estimates that a unit change in X i will be associated with a change in Y of 4b i Y ˆ 3 = 4b i (b 0 +b 1 X 1 +b 2 X 2 ) 3 ." $\endgroup$
    – Argi
    Commented Oct 5, 2012 at 22:35
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what "the Chain Rule" would tell us for the case of the inverse square root transformation. $\endgroup$
    – Argi
    Commented Oct 5, 2012 at 22:36

1 Answer 1


The model is

$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{Y}} = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X_1 + \cdots + \beta_p X_p + \varepsilon$$

where $Y$ is the original outcome, the $X_i$ are the explanatory variables, the $\beta_i$ are the coefficients, and $\varepsilon$ are iid, mean-zero error terms. Writing $b_i$ for the estimated value of $\beta_i$, we see that a one-unit change in $X_i$ adds $b_i$ to the right hand side. Starting from any baseline set of values $(x_1, \ldots, x_p)$, this induces a change in predicted values from $\widehat{1/\sqrt{y}} = b_0 + b_1 x_1 + \cdots + b_p x_p$ to $\widehat{1/\sqrt{y'}} = b_0 + b_1 x_1 + \cdots + b_p x_p + b_i$. Subtracting the first equation from the second gives

$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{\hat{y'}}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{\hat{y}}} = b_i.$$

Solving for $\hat{y'}$ gives

$$\hat{y'} = \frac{\hat{y}}{1 + 2b_i\sqrt{\hat{y}} + b_i^2 \hat{y}}.$$

One may stop here, but often we seek simpler expressions: the behavior of this one might not be any easier to understand than the original model. Simplification can be achieved provided $b_i$ is very small. If necessary, we can contemplate a tiny change in $X_i$, say by an amount $\delta$, which would replace $b_i$ in the preceding equation by $\delta b_i$. Using a sufficiently small value of $\delta$ will assure the denominator is close to $1$. When it is,

$$\frac{\hat{y}}{1 + 2\delta b_i\sqrt{\hat{y}} + \delta^2 b_i^2 \hat{y}} \approx \hat{y}(1 - 2\delta b_i\sqrt{\hat{y}} - \delta^2 b_i^2 \hat{y}),$$

whence the change in predicted values is

$$\hat{y'} - \hat{y} \approx -\delta (2b_i\sqrt{\hat{y}} + \delta b_i^2 \hat{y}).$$

Taking $\delta$ to be so small that $\delta b_i^2 \hat{y} \ll 2 b_i\sqrt{\hat{y}}$ allows us to drop the second term in the right hand side. That is, for very tiny changes, the predicted outcome changes by $-(2b_i\sqrt{\hat{y}})$ times the amount of change in $x_i$.


The appearance of the negative sign indicates that an increase in $X_i$ will decrease $Y$ when $b_i$ is positive and increase $Y$ when $b_i$ is negative. Normally, we avoid this (potentially confusing) sign reversal by using $-1/\sqrt{Y}$ instead of $1/\sqrt{Y}$ when making a reciprocal square root transformation (or any other transformation that reverses the order of numbers).

This solution method is always applicable no matter how $Y$ is re-expressed, but it can lead to complicated algebra for other transformations of $Y$. Those who know the basics of differential calculus will recognize that all we're doing here is approximating the change in $\hat{y}$ to first order using its derivative with respect to $x_i$, so they will be able to avoid most of the algebraic manipulations.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.