# What if errors (residuals) follow other distribution rather than linear regression? [duplicate]

Recently, I'm studying linear regression. I've heard that errors always follow normal distribution because they are supposed to do (in the point of they are noises). But suddenly I just wonders what if residuals of a linear regression follow other distribution rather than a normal distribution. I think I can interpret that there's a potential to approving the performance of the model because it implies that there are some data that I've didn't collect. It means irreducible errors can be reduced actually. But I'm not good at math, so I don't know it is right or not.

Once again, how can we interpret residuals of a linear regression doesn't follow other distribution and how can we utilize if they do?

• You should have a look at this post – kjetil b halvorsen Feb 9 '19 at 11:12
• @kjetilbhalvorsen Basically, the normality assumption doesn't affect on estimating regression line or performance of the regression. However, if residuals don't follow normal distribution, statistical inference such as calculating CI things could be wrong but I can use other way like bootstraping. Am I right? – Yoo Inhyeok Feb 9 '19 at 13:21
• Yes, basically that's right. You should still look out for leverage (very influential points), outliers and severely non-normal distributions. – kjetil b halvorsen Feb 9 '19 at 13:34
• @kjetilbhalvorsen thanks for the kind answers. However, they still didn't help that much for what I asked. I'm just wondering how can we interpret if residuals follow specific distribution and what does it imply. – Yoo Inhyeok Feb 9 '19 at 13:39
• Can you give some more details and context? What is your response variable? continuous? positive? otherwise? Do you suspect nonnormal distribution just because residuals do not look normal? or for some other reason? What is the goal of the analysis? ... – kjetil b halvorsen Feb 9 '19 at 13:41