I want to estimate the uncertainty of a calculation which involves a quantity from a fitted mathematical model. More specifically, the end calculation would be something like:

P = x / A_tot

where I know the uncertainty of the x quantity. Given the uncertainty of A_tot I could then estimate the uncertainty of P with standard error propagation techniques. The problem is that A_tot is given not by experiments but comes from a fitted model with the following form:

equation 1

where f(r) is a Gaussian distribution:


rp and sp are the fitted parameters, for which I have the confidence intervals, and r the independent variable.

From my model I only get a value of A_tot, which is that obtained with the best guess of my parameters. How can I estimate the uncertainty of the value of Atot so that I could use it in my final error estimation? Or should I consider it as a constant?


closed as unclear what you're asking by whuber Feb 25 at 13:40

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Because the numerator is always infinite--the integral diverges towards $+\infty$ at the lower limit--it's difficult to proceed except to reply something like "the uncertainty is always infinite" or "this makes no sense at all." $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 25 at 13:40
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the feedback. I have editted the question and hope it's more clear now. $\endgroup$ – egil137 Feb 25 at 15:25
  • $\begingroup$ There must still be something wrong with your statement of the model, because the numerator is always divergent, no matter what the fitted parameters may be. $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 25 at 15:52
  • $\begingroup$ well the model is widely used in the literature. I take it that this model doesn't allow for an uncertainty calculation of its results then.Thank you. $\endgroup$ – egil137 Feb 26 at 14:00
  • $\begingroup$ I urge you to make a detailed comparison of the formula you have presented and what you find in the literature. I doubt there is any literature on a model that cannot exist mathematically! $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 26 at 14:07