I have found myself Googling this question more than once: ¿What is the relationship between the standardized multiple regression coefficient (the standardized partial slope) and the corresponding semi-partial correlation (also called the part correlation by some)? The answers that I find are not helpful, because they always provide an answer restricted to a multiple regression model with at most 2 predictors.

Note: The following similar question (Multiple regression or partial correlation coefficient? And relations between the two) addresses partial correlations and this question (Is there a difference between semipartial correlation and regression coefficient in multiple regression?) focuses only on the trivariate model (as indicated above).

So, I will start here with a summary of the two straightforward models.

For bivariate regression $$y=\alpha + \beta· x + \epsilon$$ the standardized slope, $\beta^*$, equals the correlation between $x$ and $y$: $$\beta^* = r_{x,y}$$

For trivariate regression $$y = \alpha + \beta·x + \gamma·z + \epsilon$$ the standardized partial slope for $x$ can be written as $$\beta^* = \frac{r_{y,x} - r_{y,z}·r_{x,z}}{1-r_{x,z}^2}.$$ When taken with the fact that the semi-partial correlation $r_{y(x|z)}$ is given by the equation $$r_{y(x|z)} = \frac{r_{y,x} - r_{y,z}·r_{x,z}}{\sqrt{1-r_{x,z}^2}}$$ we can obtain the following relationship between the standardized slope and the semi-partial correlation $$\beta^* = \frac{r_{y(x|z)}}{\sqrt{1-r_{x,z}^2}}$$

For multiple regression models with 3 or more predictors $$y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 · x_1 + \beta_2 · x_2 + \cdots + \beta_k · x_k + \epsilon$$ where $k>2$. My question is whether the following formulation is correct for multiple regression models with 3 or more predictors: $$\beta_i^* = \frac{r_{y(i|\langle i\rangle)}}{\sqrt{1-R_{i,\langle i\rangle}^2}}$$ where $r_{y(i|\langle i\rangle)}$ is the semi-partial correlation for y with i partialling out all other variables but the $i$-th, and $R_{i,\langle i\rangle}^2$ is the coefficient of determination obtained from predicting the $i$-th predictor from all of the other predictors in the model. (The notation $\langle i\rangle$ indicates the set of all predictor variables but the $i$-th.)

I am fairly confident my answer is correct, but I have not located a website to confirm this. So, my questions are: (1) ¿Is this correct? (2) ¿Can someone provide a proof? or (3) ¿Can someone provide easily accessible references?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.