3
$\begingroup$

$X_1, \dots, X_n$ iis geometric: $P(X=x) = (1-p)^{x}p$, $x=0,1,2, \dots$

My Attempt:

$T=\sum_{i=1}^n X_i$ is a sufficient statistic

$W= \begin{cases}1 & X_1= 0,\\ 0 & X_1\neq 0\end{cases}$ W is an unbiased estimator of $p$

To find UMVUE, \begin{align} E[W|T=t] &= \frac{P(X_1 = 0, T=t)}{P(T=t)}\\[5pt] &= \frac{P(X_1 = 0)P(X_1+\cdots +X_n=t)}{P(T=t)}\\[5pt] \end{align} Can somebody please help me expand this step. It's confusing whether I should use $t-1$ or $t-2$ in the combination part of negative binomial pdf.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ can you please explain me how could you get this result? 1/(1+∑Xi/n−1) $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2021 at 9:52

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Since $X_j$ is the number of failures preceding the first success for each $j$, $T=\sum\limits_{j=1}^n X_j$ is the number of failures before the $n$th success. Therefore pmf of $T$ is

$$P(T=t)=\binom{n+t-1}{t}\theta^n(1-\theta)^{t}\,\mathbf1_{t\in\{0,1,2,\ldots\}}$$

Now,

\begin{align} E\left[W\mid T=t\right]&=\frac{P\left[X_1=0,\sum\limits_{i=2}^n X_i=t\right]}{P(T=t)} \\&=\frac{P(X_1=0)P\left[\sum\limits_{j=1}^{n-1} X_j=t\right]}{P(T=t)}\qquad,\,\small j=i-1 \end{align}

So the '$t$' remains as it is; it is a matter of '$n$' and '$n-1$' in the pmf of negative binomial.

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Is the answer, $\frac{1}{1+\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n-1}}$ $\endgroup$
    – Harry
    Apr 8, 2019 at 11:13
  • $\begingroup$ That is what I get, yes. $\endgroup$ Apr 8, 2019 at 13:34
  • $\begingroup$ I also tried solving this question using the fact that geometric distribution belongs to exponential family and therefore $\sum_{i=1}^n X_i$ is complete sufficient. Taking \begin{align}E(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i) &= \frac{n(1-p)}{p} \end{align} from this I got the umvue of $p$ as $\frac{1}{X\bar+1}$. Is this method wrong? $\endgroup$
    – Harry
    Apr 9, 2019 at 2:33
  • $\begingroup$ That looks like a 'method of moment' estimator, found by equating sample mean with population mean. Do you think UMVUE is the same? $\endgroup$ Apr 9, 2019 at 20:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ZeroPancakes No, $E(W)=P(X_1=0)=p$. $\endgroup$ May 10, 2020 at 6:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.