3
$\begingroup$

Elements of Statistical Learning 4.3.2 elaborates on computation for Linear Discriminant Analysis. https://web.stanford.edu/~hastie/Papers/ESLII.pdf

Procedure is said to be

• Sphere the data with respect to the common covariance estimate $\hat{Σ}: X∗ ← D^{−1/2}U^{T}X$, where $\hat{Σ} = UD U^{T}$. The common covariance estimate of $X^{∗}$ will now be the identity.

• Classify to the closest class centroid in the transformed space, modulo the effect of the class prior probabilities $π_{k}$.

How is the procedure above derived from the expression of the discriminant functions which writes in the case of identical covariance matrices for all $k$ :

$\delta_{k}(x)=x^{T}\Sigma^{-1}\mu_{k}-\frac{1}{2}\mu_{k}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}\mu_{k}+\log{\mu_{k}}$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ +1 good on you answering your own question and sharing it! :) $\endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    Apr 28, 2019 at 21:10

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Sphering ( or whitening ) the data ($X$) means applying a transformation so that in the new basis, the covariance for sphered data ($X^{*}$) is the identity matrix, i.e. $E[X^{*T}X^{*}]=I_{n}$ .

We operate this transformation to obtain significantly simpler computation. As mentioned in 4.3.2 the ingredients of $\delta_{k}(x)$ are

$(x − \hat{\mu_{k}})^{T}\hat{\Sigma}_{k}^{-1}(x − \hat{\mu_{k}}) = [U^{T}_{k} (x − \hat{\mu_{k}})]^{T}D_{k}^{-1}[U^{T}_{k} (x − \hat{\mu_{k}})]$

$\log{|\hat{\Sigma}_{k}|}=\sum_{l}\log{d_{kl}}$

where $\hat{\Sigma}_{k}=U_{k}D_{k}U_{k}^{T}$ is the eigen-decomposition for each $\hat{\Sigma}_{k}$, $U_{k}$ is $p \times p$ orthonomal and $D_{k}$ a diagonal matrix of positive eigenvalues $d_{kl}$.

Let's write the sphering of the data :

$[U^{T}_{k} (x − \hat{\mu_{k}})]^{T}D_{k}^{-1}[U^{T}_{k} (x − \hat{\mu_{k}})]$

$=(U^{T}_{k}x)^{T}D_{k}^{-1/2}D_{k}^{-1/2}U^{T}_{k}x + (U^{T}_{k}\hat{\mu}_{k})^{T}D_{k}^{-1/2}D_{k}^{-1/2}U^{T}_{k}\hat{\mu}_{k}-(U^{T}_{k}\hat{\mu}_{k})^{T}D_{k}^{-1/2}D_{k}^{-1/2}U^{T}_{k}x-(U^{T}_{k}x)^{T}D_{k}^{-1/2}D_{k}^{-1/2}U^{T}_{k}\hat{\mu}_{k}$

We operate the suggested change of variables, $X^{*}\leftarrow D^{-1/2}U^{T}X$ and similarly $\hat{\mu}_{k}^{*}\leftarrow D^{-1/2}U^{T}\hat{\mu}_{k}$. The previous calculation transforms into

$(x^{*}-\hat{\mu}_{k}^{*})^{T}(x^{*}-\hat{\mu}_{k}^{*})=\|x^{*}-\hat{\mu}_{k}^{*}\|^{2}$

Minimizing the discriminant needs to minimize this quantity, that is to say finding the class $k$ minimizing the distance between data and the centroid of class $k$ in the new base.

The last term in $\delta_{k}(x)$ is $\log{\mu_{k}}$ hence the mention on the influence of prior probability $\mu_{k}$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Therefore, would the final expression be: δk(x) = ∥x∗−μ^∗k∥2 + logμk ? $\endgroup$ Feb 2, 2021 at 6:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.