Your question is too broad for a thorough discussion here.
Of the tests you mentioned, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is
the only one generally regarded as a straightforward test of
the difference between two distributions.
Consider Sample 1 of size 100 from $\mathsf{Norm}(\mu=100,\sigma=10)$
and Sample 2 of size 110 from $\mathsf{Norm}(98, 12).$ These two
distributions are sufficiently similar that a reasonably large
sample is necessary if we are to have any chance of distinguishing
samples from them as coming from different distributions. So I chose
sample sizes around 100.
set.seed(2019)
x = rnorm(100, 100, 10); y = rnorm(110, 98, 12)
summary(x); sd(x)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
77.37 93.53 97.68 99.27 105.68 126.36
[1] 9.054535
summary(y); sd(y)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
66.01 88.31 95.94 96.01 104.92 124.35
[1] 11.84239
Summaries show that sample means and standard deviations give reasonably
good estimates of the corresponding population parameters.
A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (ks.test
in R) is (barely) able to detect at the 5%
level that the samples came from different distributions:
ks.test(x,y)
Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: x and y
D = 0.18909, p-value = 0.04723
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
Moreover, the K-S test is moderately intolerant of ties. If we round
the values in the two samples to integers, thus inducing ties, then the (approximate) P-value increases. (Subsequently, we return to unrounded data.)
X = round(x); Y = round(y); ks.test(X,Y)
Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: X and Y
D = 0.17909, p-value = 0.06946
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
Warning message:
In ks.test(X, Y) : p-value will be approximate
in the presence of ties
Below we show kernel density estimators (roughly, 'smoothed histograms')
of the two samples in the left panel. They show that Sample 1 (with mean 99.27) has generally larger values than does Sample 2 (mean 96.01).
The right panel shows empirical
cumulative distribution functions of the two samples. ECDFs, which increase by $1/n$ at each sorted value of the sample, are estimates of the CDFs of the distributions from which we sampled. The K-S test statistic $D = 0.179$ is the largest vertical discrepancy between the two ECDFs. [For further details of the K-S test perhaps you can start with Wikipedia] under the two-sample heading.]
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
hdr1 = "KDEs of Sample 1 and (red) Sample 2"
plot(density(x), xlab="",main=hdr1)
lines(density(y), col="red")
hdr2 ="ECDFs of Sample 1 and (red) Sample 2"
plot(ecdf(x), main=hdr2)
lines(ecdf(y), col="red", pch="+")
par(mfrow=c(1,1))

Finally, the two-sample Wilcoxon (rank sum) test [also called the Mann-Whitney test] is often said to test whether the parent distribution of one sample 'dominates' (is generally larger than) the distribution of another.
The one-sided Wicoxon SR test
wilcox.test(x,y, alt="gr")
Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
data: x and y
W = 6331, p-value = 0.02949
alternative hypothesis:
true location shift is greater than 0
The P-value is roughly the same for the rounded data, but with a warning
message about ties.
Perhaps others on this site will want to explain additional tests relevant to your Question.