1
$\begingroup$

Let $X_1, ... , X_n$ be i.i.d random variables Uniform $(-\theta,0)$ , with $\theta > 0$ parameter

\begin{align}f_{\theta}(x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n)&=\prod_{i=1}^nf(x_i;\theta) \\&=\frac{1}{(\theta)^n}\mathbf1_{-\theta<x_1,\cdots,x_n<0} \\&=\frac{1}{(\theta)^n}\mathbf1_{(x_{(1)}\ge-\theta)}\mathbf1_{(x_{(n)}\le0)} \end{align}

So can we conclude that the sufficient statistic for $-\theta $ so for $\theta $ too is $X_{(1)}$.

Also that the sufficient statistic for $\theta $ is $-X_{(1)}$. ??

Thus, both $X_{(1)}$ and $-X_{(1)}$ are sufficient statistics for $\theta $ ?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

As a function of $\theta$ $$ \frac{1}{\theta^n}\mathbf1_{x_{(1)}\ge-\theta}\mathbf1_{x_{(n)}\le0}= \frac{1}{\theta^n}\mathbf1_{x_{(1)}\ge-\theta} $$ Hence the likelihood function only depends on $X_{(1)}$, which makes it a sufficient statistic for $\theta$, $-\theta$, $\sin(3\theta)$ and any other function of $\theta$ (as sufficiency is not to be confused with unbiasedness or any other estimation property).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.