In the following plot, I am trying to find the correlation between two different measures:

enter image description here

I'm confused about the result of the p-value which is below the cut-off p-value of 0.05. Looking at the plot, I was expecting there will be no correlation between the two measures.

My question is it really true there is a significant correlation between the two measures? and should I say that we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative instead?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is the blue line along the top of the plot? How many observations do you have as I suspect there is much over-printing here which makes it difficult to see what is going on? $\endgroup$
    – mdewey
    Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 16:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Agree with @mdewey. Perhaps the few points at bottom center along with a slight concentration of points at upper right are enough to give a significantly positive Spearman correlation. Also many overplotted points at upper left might be slightly lower than points at upper right. Maybe start with temporary deletion of points below .5 on y axis, trying for a scale with less overplotting. // I'm wondering if there any useful association. $\endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 17:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you consider Spearman's correlation appropriate to summarize the association between the variables and rejecting its null hypothesis is of relevance, then everything seems okay. $\endgroup$
    – Michael M
    Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ @mdewey The blue line is a regression line (I accidentally added it to the ggscatter plot in R). The number of observations is 7290 so there is no overplotting. $\endgroup$
    – Adam Amin
    Commented Aug 5, 2019 at 10:57

1 Answer 1


Comment continued, with graphs using R.

y = rbeta(1000, 10, .4)
x = runif(1000)
 plot(x,y^20,pch=20, ylim=0:1)

enter image description here

Data for both plots have the same Spearman correlation.

cor(x,y, meth="sp")
[1] 0.01978538
cor(x,y^20, meth="sp")
[1] 0.01978538
  • $\begingroup$ Can I say in this case there is a significant correlation between measure x and measure y? $\endgroup$
    – Adam Amin
    Commented Aug 5, 2019 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ I couldn't edit my last comment so I have to add a new comment. If there is a significant correlation, is this because of some data points, but not all points, that show a correlation between measure x and y? $\endgroup$
    – Adam Amin
    Commented Aug 5, 2019 at 11:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.