In forecasting (ets) annual data, I notice that when I use the full data set of 10 years, the prediction intervals are much wider than when using an abridged version of the data set (5 years).
I assume this occurs because more variability is being modelled when the full range of data is provided.
Is there any way to determine whether it is more appropriate to use the full data set (10 years) or abridged data set (5 years)?