This is one of my favorites:
One entry per answer. (This is in the vein of the Stack Overflow question What’s your favorite “programmer” cartoon?.)
P.S. Do not hotlink the cartoon without the site's permission please.
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
If some people who really believe that everything should be scientifically tested would actually walk their talk than they this comic might even show an event that actually happens.
Here's a somewhat more technical one.
I don't think this one was posted yet...
Another one from xkcd:
Knuth Paper-Stack Notation: Write down the number on pages. Stack them. If the stack is too tall to fit in the room, write down the number of pages it would take to write down the number. THAT number won't fit in the room? Repeat. When a stack fits, write the number of iterations on a card. Pin it to the stack.
Here is a very meaningful chart..
This is not a cartoon, but a joke worth mentioning:
A statistic professor travels to a conference by plane. When he passes the security check, they discover a bomb in his carry-on-baggage. Of course, he is hauled off immediately for interrogation.
"I don't understand it!" the interrogating officer exclaims. "You're an accomplished professional, a caring family man, a pillar of your parish - and now you want to destroy that all by blowing up an airplane!"
"Sorry", the professor interrupts him. "I had never intended to blow up the plane."
"So, for what reason else did you try to bring a bomb on board?!"
"Let me explain. Statistics shows that the probability of a bomb being on an airplane is 1/1000. That's quite high if you think about it - so high that I wouldn't have any peace of mind on a flight."
"And what does this have to do with you bringing a bomb on board of a plane?"
"You see, since the probability of one bomb being on my plane is 1/1000, the chance that there are two bombs is 1/1000000. This way I am much safer..."
"The bridge of life"
The 'Death' attempts to kill you at different ages using different sorts of weapons which are related to the "failure probability" at the corresponding age.
A Frequentists vs. Bayesians cartoon from XKCD!
'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked whether the--' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... Yes.'
Since these are a rather sampling theoretic set of cartoons so far, here's one for the Bayesians. (Actually I set it as a class question last year.)
Because It's PIE, make me laught LOL. hahaha http://portal-statistik.blogspot.com
This one may be a little too real for anyone involved in academic research...
an 'easy to digest' pie chart example for Rick Astley fans that my students seem to enjoy
I wonder if it's OK to use %-points as an abbreviation of percentage points.
Almost a Chi square...
As the CoKF approaches 0, productivity goes negative as you pull OTHER people into chair-spinning contests.
No one put up a cartoon from the cartoon guide to statistics. I like many of them from there and I used a number of them in one of my books. The one that seems to get the most laughs when I use it in a lecture is the one with the statistician going out on a first date. Their comments and thoughts about the making decisions on the menu with the statistician assessing probabilities and the woman just choosing what she likes makes it really hilarious.
Though 100 years is longer than a lot of our resources.
Not exactly data analysis but I had a chuckle.
Yes, let's not jump to random forest before we work on some simpler branches!
John Deering, Strange Brew
I liked this one. Found on this page.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?