2
$\begingroup$

I want to compare how effective two potential solutions are, and I have "scores" for each solution such that I can graph the effectiveness of each solution over time by graphing the scores vs time for each potential solution. I want to directly compare the two in a graph by displaying the ratio of scores between the two, but the issue I have is that graphing ratios isn't visually proportional because below 1 a ratio tends towards zero, whereas above zero a ratio tends towards infinity.

Is there any precedent for graphing some derived value more akin to:

if a / b > 1
then graph (a / b - 1)
else graph (-b / a + 1)

This has the advantage of tending towards -inifity and +infinity, but I am afraid it is less intuitive to understand. Is something like this worth doing or is just graphing a direct ratio better?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ How about using a logarithmic scale? $\endgroup$ – foxpal Oct 1 '19 at 2:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is the range of values for the ratio that you need to plot? And can you add figures to illustrate the problem? $\endgroup$ – mkt - Reinstate Monica Oct 1 '19 at 5:51
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Is either quantity ever zero or negative? If not, ratios often benefit from a logarithmic scale. Consider that the entire interval $a < b$ is squeezed into (0, 1) whereas $b > a$ maps to (1, $\infty$). Logarithm corrects that asymmetry. But in practice the range of $a$ and $b$ is crucial for what works. $\endgroup$ – Nick Cox Oct 1 '19 at 7:03
2
$\begingroup$

As foxpal and Nick Cox mentioned the log scale will make a ratio symmetric.

Lets say you use a logarithm base 10. $\log_{10}(10)=1$ and $\log_{10}(\frac{1}{10})=-1$; similarly $\log_{10}(100)=2$ and $\log_{10}(\frac{1}{100})=-2$, etc.

The catch is, as Nick mentioned, that you cannot take a logarithm of zero or a negative number. As a consequence both the numerator and the denominator have to be larger than 0.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer, I think using a log scale is probably the best solution because the domain of both data sets is greater than zero and a log scale is easily understood by the reader. $\endgroup$ – Chris Philip Oct 1 '19 at 17:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.