I want to estimate a relationship of the form:


If I log this model i get:

$$\log(y)=\log(a)+b\log(x)+ \log(\epsilon)$$

If I then proceed and estimate this model using a linear Regression, my residuals look reasonably normally distributed and homoscedastic, suggesting that this is an acceptable transformation.

However I am not interested in the Parameter $\log(a)$ but in the Parameter $a$. The obvious way to estimate $a$ would be to set $\hat{a}= \exp(\widehat{\log(a)})$, which is also the Maximum Likelihood Estimator under the assumption of Normal Distribution as the ML-estimate of the Transformation of a Parameter is the tranformation of the ML-Estimate. However this estimator loses properties of unbiasedness etc. .

I wonder now whether there is a "better" way to estimate $a$ under these conditions.

  • $\begingroup$ What properties do you want your estimator to have? $\endgroup$ – whuber Oct 17 at 11:43
  • $\begingroup$ Ideally I want it to be unbiased and variance-minimal, but I don`t know whether this is possible so I would prefer a reccomendation of someone who knows what is possible. $\endgroup$ – Sebastian Oct 17 at 12:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.