0
$\begingroup$

From this paper, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.09460.pdf, page 9 enter image description here

I am confused by the line "sample $z_k \sim p(z;\theta_k)$"

It seems that $z_k$ is a random variable, as explained here Why are probability distributions denoted with a tilde?.

However, it was then plugged into the next line

$$\vartheta_{k+1} = \vartheta_k + \alpha_k R(z_k) \nabla_\vartheta\log(p(z_k;\vartheta_k))$$

which produces a vector $\vartheta_{k+1}$, which is a deterministic parameter. This can only occur if $z_k$ is a number (not a random variable).

Is there some abuse of notation going-on here or is this correct?

Is there a better way of writing this algorithm?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ $\vartheta_k$ is a random variable. $\endgroup$
    – shimao
    Jan 3, 2020 at 16:07

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

When they say that they sample $z_{k}$, it means that they get a realization of the random variable $Z_{k}$, it means that $z_{k} = Z_{k}(\omega) \in \mathbb{R}$ for some $\omega \in \Omega$, where $\Omega$ is the space on wich you random variable is defined.

Note that I have used $Z_{k}$ in capital letters to denote the random variable and $z_{k}$ in low letters to denote its realization.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So the notation is incorrect would you say? $\endgroup$
    – Fraïssé
    Jan 5, 2020 at 5:05
  • $\begingroup$ No not necessarly, people coming form bayesian stats background use this notation, but it is maybe some times unclear for people who has no knowledge about bayesian stats $\endgroup$
    – user270013
    Jan 5, 2020 at 12:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.