How is it possible to use the Bayesian Information Criterion (and more generally, to perform model selection) when observations are correlated ?
I would like to compare the BIC of different models given a data set of observations. The simplest models assume that my observations are IID; the more complicated ones assume a correlation between them (namely, the value of observation $x_i$ will depend on $x_{i-1}$).
The derivation and definition of the BIC are only valid under the assumption that data are IID. In this case, after integrating using Laplace's method, we are left with $-2log(p(x|M)) \approx -2log(p(x|\hat{\theta},M)) -2log(n^{-k/2}) -2log(|I(\hat{\theta})|^{-1/2}) - 2log(\pi(\hat{\theta}|M))-2log((2\pi)^{k/2})$ (where k is the number of parameters), which finally yields $BIC = -2log(\hat{L}) + klog(n)$, where $n$ is simply the number of data points.
Is it possible to extend this derivation for the case of correlated observations ? In this case, after integrating using Laplace's method, we are left with $-2log(p(x|M)) \approx -2log(p(x|\hat{\theta},M)) - 2log(\pi(\hat{\theta}|M))-2log((2\pi)^{k/2}) + log(|-D^2 log(p(x|\hat{\theta},M))|)$.
The last term is the determinant of the Hessian matrix of the log-likelihood function, and does not seem to simplify as nicely as in the IID case.
I would have guessed that it was a fairly common problem in model comparison, but I could not find relevant papers on how to use the BIC with correlated data. Is it possible, and if so, how would you do it ?