1
$\begingroup$

I have two categorical variables: gender (male & female) and eye color (blue, brown, & other). And I also have age.

I used the chi-square test and the multinomial logistic regression.

When doing the chi-squared test, I set gender vs eye color. The Pearson Chi-Square and Likelihood Ratio p-values were not significant, meaning there is no association between the two. The Linear-by-Linear Association, was significant though, meaning there is an association between the two. Could this be explained to me, I'm not sure why these are different.

In addition, I also ran the multinomial logistic regression. Eye color was my dependent variable, while gender and age were my independent variables.

Eye color = Gender + Age

When looking through the Parameter Estimates table (other and male are the reference categories), I see that female is significant in relation to blue, but it's not significant in relation to brown. Is this normal to have the chi-square say there is no association between the categorical variables, but the logistic regression say that there is a significant association? If not, what is happening?

{ I am using SPSS }

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is the difference large? If it's a marginal difference it's probably just the different way the tests are being computed, which is normal. $\endgroup$ – Paze Jan 29 at 10:13
  • $\begingroup$ @Paze The Pearson Chi-Square p-value is 0.112, the Linear-by-Linear Association p-value is 0.037, and the significance value for the multinomial logistic regression for blue eyes in comparison to gender is 0.013 $\endgroup$ – Cynical F Jan 29 at 18:25
  • $\begingroup$ Consider uploading your data in CSV/Excel so we can better interpret what is going on. These sound like more than marginal differences. $\endgroup$ – Paze Jan 29 at 20:42
2
$\begingroup$

High $p$-values are no guarantees that there is no association between two variables. The high $p$-value just means that the evidence is not strong enough to indicate an association. In other words, the lack of evidence for a claim is not the same as evidence for the opposite of the claim. Also, it is not unusual for two tests to say differing things about a statistic; after all, statistics are probabilistic, and it's perfectly possible that unprobable events occur, especially if you are conducting multiple tests.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.