3
$\begingroup$

This is exercise 3.97 from "Statistics for Business and Economincs", Ed. Newbold, 8th edition (I hope I am allowed to copy it here now that I've given attribution). I am struggling with solving it because I don't think there is enough information.

A company places a rush order for wire of two thicknesses. Consignments of each thickness are to be sent immediately when they are available. Previous experience suggests that the probability is 0.8 that at least one of these consignments will arrive within a week. It is also estimated that, if the thinner wire arrives within a week, the probability is 0.4 that the thicker wire will also arrive within a week. Further, it is estimated that, if the thicker wire arrives within a week, the probability is 0.6 that the thinner wire will also arrive within a week. a. What is the probability that the thicker wire will arrive within a week? b. What is the probability that the thinner wire will arrive within a week? c. What is the probability that both consignments will arrive within a week? Blockquote

Here is where I am with it: Let T1= thin wire arrives within a week; T2= thick wire arrives within a week; P(T1UT2) = 0.8; P(T2|T1) = 0.4; P(T1|T2) = 0.6 We are looking for: a) P(T1); b) P(T2); c) P(T1∩T2).

It seems to me, however, that this is not enough; that I would need either the intersection, or one of the individual probabilities. What am I missing? Or misunderstanding?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Draw the Venn diagram. You are given three facts about the probabilities of the four regions in it and you know a fourth fact automatically (they sum to unity). Solve these equations. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Feb 13 '20 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ @whuber, I can't draw the Venn diagram because two of the values given are conditional probabilities, which adds a time-factor, or a 3rd dimension, which I can't draw in 2-d. I could if this was an P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A∩B) type of question - but it isn't. Which is why I am struggling. :-( $\endgroup$
    – Reader 123
    Feb 13 '20 at 21:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's no third dimension. When you are told $\Pr(A \mid B) = 0.4,$ for instance, that's equivalent (according to the definition of conditional probability) to $0.4 = \frac{\Pr(A \cap B)}{\Pr(B)},$ implying $0.4 \Pr(B) = \Pr(A\cap B).$ That's a linear equation between two of the regions in the Venn diagram. You will have no problems solving this system of linear equations. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Feb 13 '20 at 21:36
  • $\begingroup$ So that gives me 0.6T2=0.4T1, didn't get me far (I know the proportions but they can still be anything); also 0.6= 0.6T2/T2, in other words 0.6=0.6, not helpful either. If I take the union, I get T1= 0.8+1.6T2, which then gives T1|T1=0.6T2/0.8+1.6T2, which is obviously nonsense, given 0.4=/=0.25 ... (Also, this is a very basic chapter in an introductory book; I have the solution manual for all the even-numbered exercises in the chapter and none of those require anything like this, they are all just basic applications of the rules, so there has to be a simple solution.) $\endgroup$
    – Reader 123
    Feb 17 '20 at 11:50
1
$\begingroup$

Take the following ratio: $${{P(T_1|T_2)}\over{P(T_2|T_1)}}={P(T_1)\over P(T_2)}={3\over2}$$ You can write (let $P(T_1)=x$) $P(T_2),P(T_1\cap T_2)$ in terms of $x$.

Also, you have $$P(T_1\cup T_2)=P(T_1)+P(T_2)-P(T_1\cap T_2)$$ in which you only have $x$ as the unknown.

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ thank you for taking the time to respond, I appreciate it. I know I have P(T1∪T2)=P(T1)+P(T2)−P(T1∩T2), but of these I only know P(T1∪T2) and nothing to the right side of =, so I can't use formulas like P(T1|T2)= P(T1∩T2)/T2, because for these I'd need at least one of the individual probabilities (or the intersection). I am not quite sure of the first part of what you've written: I can't quite see why the two individual probabilities would have the same ratio as the conditional ones... $\endgroup$
    – Reader 123
    Feb 13 '20 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ Write as $$P(T_1|T_2)=\frac{P(T_1\cap T_2)}{P(T_2)}$$ $\endgroup$
    – gunes
    Feb 13 '20 at 21:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Reader123 Let me write it more explicitly: $$\frac{P(T_1|T_2)}{P(T_2|T_1)}=\frac{\frac{P(T_1\cap T_2)}{P(T_2)}}{\frac{P(T_1\cap T_2)}{P(T_1)}}=\frac{P(T_1)}{P(T_2)}$$ $\endgroup$
    – gunes
    Feb 17 '20 at 11:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have upvoted it - is there a separate button to accept a solution? Can't see anything like that... :| $\endgroup$
    – Reader 123
    Feb 17 '20 at 13:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just under the lower arrow, there is a tick sign. $\endgroup$
    – gunes
    Feb 17 '20 at 13:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.