I am studying a linear regression example for machine learning. It makes the following definition:

As the name implies, linear regression solves a regression problem. In other words, the goal is to build a system that can take a vector $\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n$ as input and predict the value of a scalar $y \in \mathbb{R}$ as its output. The output of linear regression is a linear function of the input. Let $\hat{y}$ be the value that our model predicts $y$ should take on. We define the output to be

$$\hat{y} = \mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}$$

where $\mathbf{w} \in \mathbb{R}^n$ is a vector of paramters.

Parameters are values that control the behaviour of the system. In this case, $w_i$ is the coefficient that we multiply by feature $x_i$ before summing up the contributions from all the features. We can think of $\mathbf{w}$ as a set of weights that determine how each feature affects the prediction. If a feature $x_i$ receives a positive weight $w_i$, then increasing the value of that feature increases the value of our prediction $\hat{y}$.

It then says the following:

It is worth noting that the term linear regression is often used to refer to a slightly more sophisticated model with one additional parameter -- an intercept term $b$. In this model

$$\hat{y} = \mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x} + b,$$

so the mapping from parameters to predictions is still a linear function but the mapping from features to predictions is now an affine function. This extension to affine functions means that the plot of the model's predictions still looks like a line, but it need not pass through the origin. Instead of adding the bias parameter $b$, one can continue to use the model with only weights but augment $\mathbf{x}$ with an extra entry that is always set to $1$. The weight corresponding to the extra $1$ entry plays the role of the bias parameter.

The intercept term $b$ is often called the bias parameter of the affine transformation. This terminology derives from the point of view that the output of the transformation is biased toward being $b$ in the absence of any input. This term is different from the idea of a statistical bias, in which a statistical estimation algorithm’s expected estimate of a quantity is not equal to the true quantity.

This is the part that I am interested in:

This terminology derives from the point of view that the output of the transformation is biased toward being $b$ in the absence of any input.

Can someone please elaborate on this? How is the transformation biased towards being $b$ "in the absence of any input"?

Thank you.

| cite | improve this question | | | | |

That seems like really confusing terminology, but what it means is, irrespective of the input $x$, the data will tend to be centered around $b$. If $x=0$ for all observations, the output of the regression would be $b$ in each case.

Bias here refers to a global offset not explained by the predictor variable. Consider the equation of a line:

$$ y = mx + c $$ Here $m$ is slope and $c$ is the intercept. If we omit the constant intercept $c$, $m$ as well as explaining the relationship between $x$ and $y$, must also account for the overall difference in scale irrespective of the value of $x$.

To demonstrate, if we have a really simple linear model in R with a constant difference between the variables (a difference in scale), then ignoring the intercept causes us to incorrectly estimate the relationship between $x$ and $y$ (the slope).

x <- rnorm(100)
y <- (3*x) + 100
lm(y ~ x)
#> Call:
#> lm(formula = y ~ x)
#> Coefficients:
#> (Intercept)            x  
#>         100            3
lm(y ~ 0 + x)
#> Call:
#> lm(formula = y ~ 0 + x)
#> Coefficients:
#>      x  
#> -5.505
| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.