Here is the code:

 for (i in 1:10000){u<-runif(100);pareto<-u^(1/2);paretobar[i]<-mean(pareto)}
 hist(betahat1, col = "sky blue")
 mean(betahat1)## [1] 0.3997934
 mean(paretobar)## [1] 0.666431

Originally the data is distributed with beta distribution, so I transform the uniformly generated data, so that they would be derived from Beta distribution. I don't get the second step where each data point in paretobar is computed by taking mean of the pareto. But it's something to do with expected value? Anyway in the results the estimator betahat1 is not equal to paretobar, but I havr a feeling, that they should be, maybe anyone sees an error in my code?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.