Why if in OLS the autocorrelation between residuals is positive, it will lead to inflated t-stats? Why if in OLS the autocorrelation between residuals is positive, it will lead to inflated t-stats for the coefficients? I've seen that statement as a given truth, but what is the intuition/proof between that result? 
Does it mean that if the autocorrelation between residuals is negative, it will lead to deflated t-stats in the regression? 
 A: Let me try to illustrate with the most simple regression example, that of a regression on a constant. The idea is similar in general regressions.
We then know that the OLS estimator $\hat\beta=\bar{y}$, the sample mean. The t-statistic is 
$$
t=\frac{\sqrt{n}\bar{y}}{\sqrt{Var(\bar{y})}}$$
In the denominator of a t-statistic, we therefore require an estimator of $Var(\bar{y})$, related to the so-called long-run variance of $Y_i$. 
As, for example, this answer demonstrates, this means the variance of a single $Y_i$, call it $\sigma^2$, plus two times autocovariances. 
When we have positive serial correlation, these autocovariances will generally be positive, meaning that a good estimator (in the sense of yielding t-ratios that, asymptotically at least, behave like $N(0,1)$ random variables if the null is true) of $Var(\bar{y})$ will be larger than the default estimator that takes the average of the squared residuals and thus only estimates $\sigma^2$. 
Put differently, if we nevertheless use the default estimator which is inappropriate under serial correlation, t-ratios will on average be too large ("inflated"), meaning tests reject too often. 
For example, one can show that the long-run variance of an AR(1) process is
$$
\sigma^2/(1-\phi)^2
$$
We see that this is larger than $\sigma^2$ when $\phi>0$, but smaller if $\phi<0$, so that "deflated" t-statistics are indeed also possible. 
