I am learning the generalized estimating equations (GEE) and the geepack R package. There are some questions that I am a little confused.

In a GEE-constructed model, we have $Var(Y_{it})=\phi_{it}\cdot V(\mu_{it})$, where $\phi$ is the scale parameter. We further decompose $Var(Y)$ into $V^{1/2}R(\alpha)V^{1/2}$ where $\alpha$ is the correlation parameter. Three link-models are specified in geepack, for $\mu,\phi,\alpha$, respectively. See this PDF file for details.

(1) In GEE1, can I say we only need to make sure that the mean structure is correctly specified, i.e. the link model $g(\mu)=X\beta$ is correct, while it doesn't matter whether the link models for $\phi$ and $\alpha$ are correctly specified?

(2) By default, the geese.fit function makes the scale value scale.value = 1.0 -- does it say $\phi=1.0$? It is understandable that the default alpha=NULL as people can specify different correlation structures and the program will assign appropriate alpha values accordingly. My question is: how often people try to explicitly model the scale parameter $\phi$?

(3) This question is closely related to (2) about the scale parameter $\phi$. Recall the variance function is $Var(Y_{it})=\phi_{it}\cdot V(\mu_{it})$. In the Gaussian case, we have $\phi=\sigma^2$ and $V(\mu_{it})=1$; in the binomial case, we have $\phi=1$ and $V(\mu_{it})=\mu_{it}(1-\mu_{it})$; in the Poisson case, we have $\phi=1$ and $V(\mu_{it})=\mu_{it}$. Can I say that, in the negative binomial case, $\phi=1$ and $V(\mu_{it})=\mu_{it}+\varphi\mu_{it}^2$? Here $\varphi$ is the NB2 dispersion parameter, NOT the scale parameter $\phi$ in GEE.

Thank you very much!

| cite | improve this question | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.