Say I have discipline incident data from a total population (not a sample) of students in a school district. If I split the students into groups by some demographic marker (such as race), then I will get very different numbers of students in each group and very different number of students with an incident in each group.
For example, if I had groups A,B,C, and for a given year,
Group A had 500 students with 50 of those students having discipline incidents
Group B had 200 students with 15 having incidents
Group C had 40 students with 8 having incidents
I can of course say that:
50/500 = 10% of Group A had incidents
15/200 = 7.5% of Group B had incidents
8/40 = 20% of Group C had incidents
How do I determine how much confidence I can have that the size of the group and the number of incidents is large enough for each group over the given year?
Most of the things I am reading related to confidence intervals and margins of error are related to samples from a population, which this is not. This is an entire population. They also often refer to finding a mean, such as if you were using data from a survey of student heights or something.
In other words, how does my confidence change if I keep growing the size of the group and number of incidents proportionally? For example if Group C, rather than being 40 students with 8 having incidents, we had 400 students with 80 incidents or 4000 students with 800 incidents?
And how does the number of students with incidents specifically affect my confidence? So for example, if I had 40 students with 20 having incidents or 40 students with only 1 having incidents?
What I would love to have would be a cutoff point for the minimum number of students needed and the minimum number of students with incidents needed to say that the data is valid. As well as a confidence level or margin of error for each proportion.
Thanks very much.