4
$\begingroup$

I came across the following inequality:

$$\frac{1+\rho}{2} \geq\left(\frac{1+\tau}{2}\right)^{2} \tag{1}$$

where $\rho$ denotes Spearman's correlation coefficient and $\tau$ denotes Kendall's rank correlation coefficient. How does one derive this inequality?

For example, in this article they cite the following inequality:

$$ -1 \leqslant \frac{3(n+2)}{(n-2)} \tau-\frac{2(n+1)}{(n-2)} \rho \leqslant+1 $$

and, considering the right hand side inequality, I could reduce the expression to $$(n+2)\tau \leq n \rho.$$

However, how does one derive the inequality in (1)? Starting from the basic definitions of $\rho$ and $\tau$ would be highly appreciated so as to understand the complete process.

Any help is appreciated!

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting that this appears to have the inequality flipped from that linked question. $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Jul 1, 2020 at 2:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Thomas - where did you find that first formula? $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Jul 1, 2020 at 2:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Sycorax Actually, I believe that question posts the inequality the wrong way! $\endgroup$
    – Bergson
    Commented Jul 1, 2020 at 3:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ With minus instead of plus signs it's on the last page of jstor.org/stable/2984072, and that turns out to be where Nelsen attributes the proof. Looking at the corollary Nelsen gives just below it, the inequality seems to only be useful for $\tau\leq 0$, since it's weaker than the inequality $\rho>(3\tau-1)/2$ when $\tau>0$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 1, 2020 at 3:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/473683. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Jul 1, 2020 at 13:40

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.