4
$\begingroup$

I have conducted a logistic regression in R

> Model <- glm(A ~ B + C, family = "binomial", data = Data)
> summary(Model)

Coefficients:
                    Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)  
(Intercept)          -1.6138   678.6939  -0.002   0.9981  
BPu                   1.0003     0.5539   1.806   0.0709 .
C.L                  21.2450  2146.2181   0.010   0.9921  
C.Q                   1.2210  1813.8853   0.001   0.9995  
C.C                   9.8965  1073.1091   0.009   0.9926  
C^4                  -0.3275   405.5973  -0.001   0.9994  

exp(coef(Model))

       (Intercept)           BPu               C.L                 C.Q        
      1.991295e-01       2.719031e+00       1.684921e+09       3.390646e+00    
          C.C             C^4 
       1.986151e+04       7.207529e-01

As I understand it when the independent variable, B, (a binary variable) changes to Pu this is associated with an increase in the log odds of a "success" in the dependent by 1.0003, or that odds of increasing the dependent variable are multiplied by 3.22 relative to the intercept, and this change is near significant.

Can I say a similar statement for the variable CR, a 5 level ordinal variable? I've found online that L, Q, C, ^4 represent linear quadratic, cubic ... but I haven't found an answer outlining what I can practically say about these coefficients or how to interpret them.

I understand that the influence is likely to be insignificant, but which P value do I use? What can I say about the other coefficients?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I think a lot of your answers can be found in the answer to a similar question. The one caveat is that the linear, quadratic, cubic, and quartic terms do not directly correspond to numeric effects as though you used the factor levels as a raw number. You can see this by typing contr.poly(5) in $R$ to see how the various levels are coded (beyond the intercept = constant = all 1's).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this answer. Would you mind expanding on what contr.poly(5) tells me. Additionally, suppose C.L (in the example above) had a significant p value here, what statement can be made about that ordinal variable? By statement, I mean something similar to the first paragraph after my example. $\endgroup$ – Harry Jul 25 '20 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ contr.poly(n) tells you the encoding for a factor with n levels (omitting the encoding for the base = constant which is just all ones. The weights create orthogonal polynomials; however, that also lets you figure out the effect of a given factor level: take the product of encoding values for that factor and coefficient estimates. If C.L has a significant $p$-value, that is evidence that there is a significant linear relationship with respect to your ordinal factor. (For the above: increases in the factor lead to significant increases in the log-odds for the dependent variable.) $\endgroup$ – kurtosis Jul 26 '20 at 23:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.