In this MAML paper, they use following formula of gradient descent update (see page 3, algorithm 1):
$$ \varTheta '\ =\varTheta \ −\ \alpha \nabla _{\varTheta }\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{T}_{i}}( f_{\varTheta }) $$
My question is, what is the reason of having theta in subscript after gradient (nabla) ?
Specifically, why is it not like this:
$$ \displaystyle \varTheta '\ =\varTheta \ −\ \alpha \nabla \mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{T}_{i}}( f_{\varTheta }) \ $$
In other words why is not enough to tell it like just gradient of loss function?