19
$\begingroup$

For a random variable $X\sim \text{Exp}(\lambda)$ ($\mathbb{E}[X] = \frac{1}{\lambda}$) I feel intuitively that $\mathbb{E}[X|X > x]$ should equal $x + \mathbb{E}[X]$ since by the memoryless property the distribution of $X|X > x$ is the same as that of $X$ but shifted to the right by $x$.

However, I'm struggling to use the memoryless property to give a concrete proof. Any help is much appreciated.

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: $f_{X|X > a}(x) = f_X(x-a)$ is the mathematical expression corresponding to "shifted to the right by $a$", and so $$E[X\mid X>a] = \int_{-\infty}^\infty xf_{X\mid X>a}(x)\,\mathrm dx= \int_{-\infty}^\infty xf_X(x-a)\,\mathrm dx.$$ Now do a change of variables on the integral on the right. $\endgroup$ Jan 25, 2013 at 17:19
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note that $X|X>x$ is a truncated distribution truncated below "$x$".Specially it is shifted exponential distribution and shifted exponential does not have memoryless property. $\endgroup$
    – A.D
    Jan 25, 2013 at 18:53

2 Answers 2

19
$\begingroup$

$\ldots$ by the memoryless property the distribution of $X|X > x$ is the same as that of $X$ but shifted to the right by $x$.

Let $f_X(t)$ denote the probability density function (pdf) of $X$. Then, the mathematical formulation for what you correctly state $-$ namely, the conditional pdf of $X$ given that $\{X > x\}$ is the same as that of $X$ but shifted to the right by $x$ $-$ is that $f_{X \mid X > x}(t) = f_X(t-x)$. Hence, $E[X\mid X > x]$, the expected value of $X$ given that $\{X > x\}$ is $$\begin{align} E[X\mid X > x] &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty t f_{X \mid X > x}(t)\,\mathrm dt\\ &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty t f_X(t-x)\,\mathrm dt\\ &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty (x+u) f_X(u)\,\mathrm du &\scriptstyle{\text{on substituting}~u = t-x}\\ &= x + E[X]. \end{align}$$ Note that we have not explicitly used the density of $X$ in the calculation, and don't even need to integrate explicitly if we simply remember that (i) the area under a pdf is $1$ and (ii) the definition of expected value of a continuous random variable in terms of its pdf.

$\endgroup$
0
10
$\begingroup$

For $x>0$, the event $\{X>x\}$ has probability $P\{X>x\}=1-F_X(x)=e^{-\lambda x} > 0$. Hence, $$ \newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}} \E[X\mid X> x] = \frac{\E[X\,I_{\{X>x\}}]}{P\{X>x\}} \, , $$ but $$ \E[X\,I_{\{X>x\}}] = \int_x^\infty t\,\lambda\,e^{-\lambda t}\,dt = (*) $$ (using Feynman's trick, vindicated by the Dominated Convergence Theorem, because it is fun) $$ (*) = -\lambda \int_x^\infty \frac{d}{d\lambda}(e^{-\lambda t}) \,dt = -\lambda \frac{d}{d\lambda} \int_x^\infty e^{-\lambda t} \,dt $$ $$ = -\lambda \frac{d}{d\lambda} \left(\frac{1}{\lambda} \int_x^\infty \lambda\,e^{-\lambda t} \,dt\right) = -\lambda\frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(\frac{1}{\lambda}\left(1 - F_X(x)\right)\right) $$ $$ = -\lambda\frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(\frac{e^{-\lambda x}}{\lambda}\right) = \left(\frac{1}{\lambda}+x\right)e^{-\lambda x} \, , $$ which gives the desired result $$ \E[X\mid X>x] = \frac{1}{\lambda}+x = \E[X] + x \, . $$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Although the use of Feynman's trick is interesting, why not just integrate by parts to get $$\int_x^\infty t\lambda e^{-\lambda t}\,dt = -t e^{-\lambda t}\biggr |_x^\infty + \int_x^\infty e^{-\lambda t}\,dt = \left(x + \frac{1}{\lambda}\right)e^{-\lambda x}?$$ $\endgroup$ Mar 23, 2013 at 14:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.