0
$\begingroup$

I'm facing a statistical issue.

I'm analysing a medical dataset, in which I have a full population. I know if they have a certain disease or not. Let's say I have 100 000 people on this, 20% having the disease.

Now, I want to know if "Being older than 80" increases the risk of having the disease. I select all people in my full population that are over 80. Let's say, in this sub-population, I have 5 000 people, and 30% having the disease.

I'm stuck in this point : Even though the percentage of people having the disease is higher in my sub-population, since I have way less people, I think this could also be linked with incertitude and "uncluck". Does some metric exists to show if my sub-population rate change is due to incertitude, or is really due to the fact I selected the 80+, and they appear to be risky.

What I tried :

  • Applying a confidence interval in my sub-population, and looking if my global population rate is in : The interval is like [29.5, 30.5] and is way far, but seems to be a nonsense, since it gives the possible value of my sub-population rate, and will never be linked with the global population one
  • Comparison of 2 proportions : Seems not perfect to me since my 2 populations are not independant, and way unbalances
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I myself found an answer through the book 100 Statistical tests, Kanji (1995)

The test to apply in such a situation is "Test 5 Z-test for the equality of two proportions (binomial distribution)", you can find it at the 27th page of the book ( = 36th slide of the pdf )

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.