Any standard mathematical statistics book would give you detailed approach of how to do log likelihood. If you want better understanding of Likelihood theory then I would recommend a wonderful text In all Likelihood by Pawitan.
For your specific problem Likelihood $L$ can be written as :
$$f(\mathbf{x},\beta) = \frac{1}{\beta} \ e^{\left(\frac{-\mathbf{x}}{\beta}\right)}; \mathbf{x}>0$$
$$L(\beta,\mathbf{x}) = L(\beta,x_1,...,x_N) = \prod_{i=1}^N f(x_i,\beta)$$
$$L(\beta,\mathbf{x}) = \prod_{i=1}^N \frac{1}{\beta} \ e^{\left(\frac{-x_i}{\beta}\right)} $$
The Log likelihood $\mathscr{L} = log(L)$:
$$\mathscr{L}(\beta,\mathbf{x}) = log\left(\prod_{i=1}^N \frac{1}{\beta} \ e^{\left(\frac{-x_i}{\beta}\right)} \right)$$
So doing some algebra and applying properties of Logarithms you get:
$$\mathscr{L}(\beta,\mathbf{x}) = log\left(\prod_{i=1}^N \frac{1}{\beta} \ e^{\left(\frac{-x_i}{\beta}\right)}\right) = \sum_{i=1}^N \left( log\left(\frac{1}{\beta}\right) + log\left( e^{\left(\frac{-x_i}{\beta}\right)} \right) \right)$$
Since the first part of equation has nothing to do with summation take $log(\frac{1}{\beta})$ outside of summation.
$$\mathscr{L}(\beta,\mathbf{x}) = N \ log\left(\frac{1}{\beta}\right) + \sum_{i=1}^N \left( \frac{- x_i} {\beta} \right)$$
The above can be further simplified:
$$\mathscr{L}(\beta,\mathbf{x}) = - N \ log(\beta) + \frac{1}{\beta}\sum_{i=1}^N -x_i$$
To get the maximum likelihood, take the first partial derivative with respect to $\beta$ and equate to zero and solve for $\beta$:
$$ \frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial \beta} = \frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \left(- N \ log(\beta) + \frac{1}{\beta}\sum_{i=1}^N -x_i \right) = 0$$
$$ \frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial \beta} = -\frac{N} {\beta} + \frac{1} {\beta^2} \sum_{i=1}^N x_i = 0$$
Now solving for $\beta$ you get:
$$\boxed{\beta = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N x_i}{N} = \overline{\mathbf{x}}}$$
Please note that in your question $\lambda$ is parameterized as $\frac {1} {\beta}$ in the exponential distribution. Regardless of parameterization, the maximum likelihood estimator should be the same.