I have a mediation model wherein the total effect (x -> y) is non-significant, but the direct effect ox x->y is significant. There is no significant indirect effect (no mediation), and the IV- mediator relationship, and mediator-DV relationship (path a and b) are non significant. I don't know how to interpret or report this, since my original hypothesis (that X significantly relates to y, via correlations and comparing Y in groups scoring low and high on X, and incidentally a NS total effect in the mediation output on PROCESS) was not met, but when I test for mediation, suddenly there is a direct effect of X on Y, and there is no evidence of the mediator relating to X nor Y!
How can this be interpreted?
Thanks!