1
$\begingroup$

I am looking at a test strategy for Covid-19, where I want to combine two tests with different sensitivity and specificity.

Visualizing this would probably make sense in a "1-sensitivity" vs "1-specificity" graph. Is there a name for these quantities?

Informally (in particular in my head) I talk about false negative vs false positive rate, but I have already realized this is ambigous, since people will have different intuitions what I am normalizing to.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

You can refer to $1-$ Sensitivity as the "false negative rate" (aka $\beta$ error or Type II error), and $1-$ Specificity as the "false positive rate" (aka $\alpha$ error or Type I error).

You can see it on the right-side box on the Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_and_specificity

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I like the wording, but from experience it is unclear what the denominator is: 1) all people tested or 2) all who were tested positive (ie people confuse with 1-NPV) or 3) all who are truly positive (1- sensitivity, what we want). $\endgroup$ Dec 13, 2020 at 8:42
  • $\begingroup$ But of course with the Wikipedia as a reference that will clear it up for most people ;-). I might actually start using „miss rate“ and „fallout“, which are given there as synonyms. Have you seen those used IRL? $\endgroup$ Dec 13, 2020 at 8:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I've seen "false positive rate" and "false negative rate" used. I haven't seen "fallout" used, and I wouldn't really know what it refers to. "miss rate" I think is a bit clearer, but I still think you'd need to explain what you mean when you use it because it's not common. $\endgroup$ Dec 13, 2020 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.