1
$\begingroup$

I've built a mixed effects logistic regression model using glmer().

I'm trying to measure clause transitivity (2 possibilities: transitive/intransitive)

Each observation is a clause and clauses are nested within households and, in turn, socio-economic status. So those are my random variables, which -I understand- should be nested.

My fixed effects are word order, speaker (adult, child), addressee (target child, other participant) and language.

The formula looks like this:

Transitivity ~ order + speaker + addressee + language + (1|household/ses).

As a result I'm getting convergence problems I can't solve. So I was wondering, on a theoretical level, if I could treat 'household' and 'ses' as two non-nested random effects (as below). Or perhaps I should drop household as a random effect (supposing that ses variability is greater than individual household variability)?

Transitivity ~ order + speaker + addressee + language + (1|household) + (1|ses).

Other important info:

Number of observations: 2207

**Random effects

number of households = 24 (4 of ses1, 8 of ses2, 12 of ses3)

numbers of ses = 3 (ses1: 659 clauses, ses2: 576 clauses, ses3: 972 clauses)

** Fixed effects

levels of word order = 3

levels of speaker = 2

levels of addressee = 2

levels of language = 3 (language 1: 1562 clauses, language 2: 256 clauses, language 3: 389 clauses)

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I'm surprised that you're treating ses as a random effect. Can you explain why? I wouldn't think the levels of SES would be exchangeable ... $\endgroup$ – Ben Bolker Mar 11 at 15:26
  • $\begingroup$ Ses and language are quite superimposed in the study -and in the world-. As some languages are indigenous, people who speak them are frequently low ses. As I want to single out the effect of language alone, and I'm not interested in the effect of ses, in this case I treated ses as a random effect. (3 out of 4 households in ses1 are indigenous, while 1 out of 12 households in ses3 is indigenous). $\endgroup$ – Leandra Mar 11 at 15:50
1
$\begingroup$

From the description, levels of household are nested within levels of ses. However, your model formula (1|household/ses) says the opposite - this says that ses is nested within household. Instead you would want:

(1|ses/household)

However, if ses really is the upper layer of nesting, then with only 3 of them, it makes no sense at all to fit random intercepts. You would be asking the software to estimate a variance for a normally distributed variable from only 3 observations.

ses should be a fixed effect here, provided that it is either a potential confounder (a cause of the outcome and exposures) or a competing exposure (only a cause of the outcome), and not a mediator, in which case the model should be:

Transitivity ~ order + speaker + addressee + language + ses + (1|household) 
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.