4
$\begingroup$

Let $(X_n)_n$ be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables, and let $\rho \in (0,1)$. Is there any asymptotic Theorem for the following random variable:

$$ Y = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{i=0}^n \rho^iX_i $$ in the fashion of a Law of large numbers? My conjecture is that $Y \rightarrow^{a.s.} \frac{\mathbb{E}[X]}{1-\rho}$, but I am not able to find a proof nor a reference about it.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The conjecture can't be correct - for example, suppose the $X_i$ are Bernoulli distributed with parameter 0.5 and $\rho$ is 0.1. Then if $X_1 = 0$, it is impossible for $Y$ to ever exceed 0.5, so it can't almost surely be equal to something greater than 0.5. $\endgroup$
    – fblundun
    Commented Mar 16, 2021 at 11:25
  • $\begingroup$ That wonderful counterexample by @fblundun exposes the basic problem: as $n$ increases, the contributions of the first few $X_i$ will persist: the only possible way we could hope for a limiting theorem would be for the contributions of the remaining $X_i$ eventually to overwhelm the first few. Since that's impossible when $|\rho|\lt 1,$ pursuing any result of this type looks hopeless. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Mar 16, 2021 at 15:34

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

To see why this is not possible, let $\psi_Y$ be the cumulant generating function for $Y$. It is defined for any real number $t$ by

$$\psi_Y(t) = \log E\left[e^{itY}\right].$$

If the sum in the question converges to a random variable $Y,$ then taking $X$ to be distributed like all the $X_i$ and independent of them we see

$$Y \sim \lim_{n\to\infty} X + \rho X_0 + \rho^2 X_1 + \cdots = X + \lim_{n\to\infty} \rho\left(X_0 + \rho X_1 + \cdots\right) = X + \rho Y .$$

This entails

$$\psi_Y(t)=\psi_X(t) + \psi_Y( \rho t ) $$

for all $t.$ We may recover $\psi_X$ from the distribution $Y$ via

$$\psi_X(t) = \psi_Y(t) - \psi_Y(\rho t)$$

and, since the c.g.f $\psi_X$ determines the distribution of $X,$ we can reverse the process: $Y$ determines the common distribution of the $X_i.$

Consequently there can be no analog of the laws of large numbers, which posit convergence to universal limiting distributions (under mild assumptions about the $X_i$), effectively wiping out almost all information about the underlying distribution used to arrive at the limit.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.