0
$\begingroup$

My regression is of the form:

$$y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1} Treat + \beta_{2} X + u$$

The $y$ variable is normalized. The $Treat$ variable is a binary dummy.

How should I interpret $\beta_{1}$ or the effect of the treatment? Is it something like, "getting the treatment changes $y$ by t standard deviations" where $t=\beta_{1} / \sigma_{y}$?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The model predicts that the treatment group scores $\beta_1$ standard deviations higher on the (unstandardized) $y$ variable than the non-treatment group, controlling for the $X$ variable. No need to divide $\beta_1$ by $\sigma_y$ if $y$ is already standardized and no need to divide $\beta_1$ by $\sigma_{treat}$ if $treat$ is a dummy code.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks so much, @Jeffrey! Can I write is as "getting the treatment changes y by β1 standard deviations"? $\endgroup$
    – Jerry
    Apr 28 at 4:05
  • $\begingroup$ The word "changes" implies a causal effect, which you may or may not have evidence of (I would need more information.) Safer to just describe the group difference as I did. $\endgroup$ Apr 28 at 4:07
  • $\begingroup$ Ahh, thanks! Yes, the model is written in a way that it's to explain the causality between Treat and y. Treat is exogeneous and most variables affected y are controlled for. Thanks again! $\endgroup$
    – Jerry
    Apr 28 at 4:09
  • $\begingroup$ Also note that my answer assumes that by "normalized" you mean standardized or z-scored by subtracting the sample mean and then dividing by the sample SD. $\endgroup$ Apr 28 at 4:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.