A bit of context

I am looking for a lag-1 autoregressive process with non-Gaussian innovation/residual error, which is capable of producing both skewed and non-skewed marginal distributions.

I am aware of non-Gaussian conditional AR(1) processes (references cited in this CV answer, especially Grunwald, Hyndman, & Tedesco, 1995). Among them, the GAR(1) model of Gaver and Lewis (1980) and Lawrance (1982) is a great choice as it can produce marginal Gamma distributions. Though, the interpretation of the model is so peculiar for my target readership.

So, as an alternative, I am considering simply replacing the Gaussian i.i.d. innovations of a normal AR(1) with $\chi^2$ distribution with $k$ degrees of freedom, or more generally, Gamma distribution with shape parameter $\alpha$ and scale parameter $\lambda$:

$$X_t = c + \phi X_{t-1} + \epsilon_t, \ \ \cases{\mathbb{A}: \epsilon_t \sim \chi^2(k) \\ \mathbb{B}: \epsilon_t \sim \Gamma(\alpha, \lambda)}$$

What I am looking for

I am looking for analytical expressions for the (approximate) marginal mean and skewness of an AR(1) process with either of these distributions. (Variance is not super important to me.)

(I know the $\chi^2$ distribution is a special case of the Gamma distribution. Though in case the results are hard to attain with Gamma innovations, I can live with results for the $\chi^2$ innovations.)

What I already know

  1. I know one can write the AR(1) as an infinite-order moving average model, and deriving the marginal distribution via the weighted sum of the innovations:

$$X_t = \mu + \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \phi^l \epsilon_{t-l}$$

  1. I know one can derive the moment generating function of weighted sums of Gamma-distributed random variables of different shapes ($\alpha_i$) but the same scale ($\lambda$), which is expressed in Di Salvo (2008), which is a quite complicated, and I do not know how to simplify it for the case of the infinite sum of exponentially decaying random variables (given the $MA(\infty$) formulation above.

  2. Mathai (1982, pp. 591-592) has mentioned that a similar summation has been studied by others and only cites Prabhu (1965), which I could not find it online:

enter image description here

Any ideas on how to derive the mean and skewness of the marginal distribution in either case?


  • Di Salvo, F. (2008). A characterization of the distribution of a weighted sum of gamma variables through multiple hypergeometric functions. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 19(8), 563–575. https://sci-hub.se/10.1080/10652460802045258

  • Gaver, D. P., & Lewis, P. A. W. (1980). First-Order Autoregressive Gamma Sequences and Point Processes. Advances in Applied Probability, 12(3), 727–745. https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/1426429

  • Grunwald, G. K., Hyndman, R. J., & Tedesco, L. M. (1995). A unified view of linear AR(1) models. http://robjhyndman.com/papers/ar1.pdf

  • Lawrance, A. J. (1982). The Innovation Distribution of a Gamma Distributed Autoregressive Process. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 9(4), 234–236. https://sci-hub.se/10.2307/4615888

  • Mathai, A. M. (1982). Storage capacity of a dam with gamma type inputs. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 34(3), 591–597. https://sci-hub.se/10/c75ggp

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can derive the stationary mean, variance and skew via the laws of total expectation, variance and skew (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…), respectively. $\endgroup$ Jun 1, 2021 at 10:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, wasn't aware of generalizations of the law of total expectation/variance! Though I have difficulty employing it: What do I need to substitute $Y$ with in $\mu_3(X)= E[\mu_3(X\mid Y)]+\mu_3[E(X\mid Y)] +3cov[E(X\mid Y),var(X\mid Y)]$, and whether it can be simplified when standardizing it to get to skewness? $\endgroup$
    – psyguy
    Jun 1, 2021 at 10:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think you need to look at $X_t$ and condition on $X_{t-1}$. $\endgroup$ Jun 1, 2021 at 10:50

2 Answers 2


For $\epsilon_t\sim \Gamma(\alpha,\lambda)$ wherein $\alpha$ is the shape parameter and $\lambda$ is the scale parameter, using the law of total expectation, we find that the stationary mean satisfies \begin{align} \mu&=E(X_t) \\&=EE(X_t|X_{t-1}) \\&=E(c + \phi X_{t-1} + \alpha\lambda) \\&=c+\phi \mu + \alpha\lambda. \end{align} Hence, $$ \mu=\frac{c+\alpha\lambda}{1-\phi}. $$ Similarly, using the law of total variance, the stationary variance satisfies \begin{align} \sigma^2&=\operatorname{Var}X_t \\&=E\operatorname{Var}X_t|X_{t-1}+\operatorname{Var}E X_t|X_{t-1} \\&=E\alpha\lambda^2+\operatorname{Var}(c+\phi X_t+\alpha\lambda) \\&=\alpha\lambda^2 + \phi^2\sigma^2, \end{align} such that $$ \sigma^2=\frac{\alpha\lambda^2}{1-\phi^2}. $$ Finally, using the law of total cumulance, the stationary third central moment $\kappa_3$ satisfies \begin{align} \kappa_3 &= \mu_3(X_t) \\&= E(\mu_3(X_t|X_{t-1}))+\mu_3(EX_t|X_{t-1})+3\operatorname{Cov}(EX_t|X_{t-1},\operatorname{Var} X_t|X_{t-1} ) \\&= E{2\alpha}{\lambda^3}+\mu_3(c+\phi X_t+\alpha\lambda)+3\operatorname{Cov}(c+\phi X_t+\alpha\lambda,\alpha{\lambda^2} ) \\&={2\alpha}{\lambda^3}+\phi^3\kappa_3 \end{align} which solved for $\kappa_3$ yields, $$ \kappa_3=\frac{2\alpha\lambda^3}{1-\phi^3}, $$ and $$ \operatorname{Skew}X_t=\frac{\kappa_3}{\sigma^3}=\frac{2(1-\phi^2)^{3/2}}{\sqrt\alpha(1-\phi^3)} $$ As expected the skew tends to 0 as $\phi$ tends to 1.

  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thanks a lot, you totally answers my question! $\endgroup$
    – psyguy
    Jun 1, 2021 at 11:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I edited the shape-rate parameterization of Gamma distribution in your answer (pending moderator approval) to accommodate shape-scale parameterization (as stated in the question) I noticed that discrepancy in my simulations). $\endgroup$
    – psyguy
    Jun 3, 2021 at 15:03

the transformation is xj/xm and the mean is uj which is centrally distributed and independent of the variance. the skewness is n=1,2,... Zn+m is a forecast for the moment generating function given by the transformation above. Uj=Zn+m is a new forecast with a variance of 1.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.