2
$\begingroup$

Let us say, I observe 3 variables in a control condition and a treatment condition. I would like to find out whether the treatment has some effect on all 3 variables at the same time. I should mention that I cannot observe the 3 variables simultaneously. In a first experiment, I would measure variable A in control vs. treatment, in a second experiment, I would measure variable B in control vs. treatment and so on.

For each of the variables, the null hypothesis that the treatment has no effect was tested. So, I have 3 p-values, one for each variable. (and I only have access to these data, not the raw data).

I read Test for significant excess of significant p-values across multiple comparisons

Let us see whether I understand this correctly:

  • $H_A$: all $p_i$ have the same (unknown) non--uniform, non--increasing density,
  • this would mean, I test, whether the treatment has the same effect on all 3 variables.

  • $H_B$: at least one $p_i$ has an (unknown) non--uniform, non--increasing density.

    and this would mean, the treatment has an effect on at least one variable.

    Is there also a way, to test whether there is some effect (but not necessarily the same effect) on all of the variables? Intuitively, this should be the case, if all 3 p-values are small and it would not be the case, if the maximum p-value would be large, I would say.

  • $\endgroup$
    6
    • $\begingroup$ You lack crucial information: namely, the degree to which the three variables are correlated (conditional on the values of the explanatory variables). Although you can still deduce something about the plausible range of p-values for your simultaneous test of all three variables, that range is large. When all three are strongly correlated, one p-value tells you about as much as all three. When all three are independent, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/20616, stats.stackexchange.com/questions/78596, and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/66300 for examples. $\endgroup$
      – whuber
      Jun 28 at 11:02
    • $\begingroup$ There have been a number of attempts to deal with the case where the individual tests cannot be assumed to be independent. You might be interested in the R package poolr cran.r-project.org/package=poolr even if you do not use R. The manual contains a number of references. $\endgroup$
      – mdewey
      Jun 28 at 14:42
    • $\begingroup$ @whuber: thanks for your comment. In fact, I do not know whether the variables are correlated. However, the measurement was done such that there are no correlations among the variables (I updated the question accordingly). Thanks for the 3 links! I checked them and they basically refer to Fisher's method and Stoufers' method. Now, according to stats.stackexchange.com/questions/171742/…, these two methods are designed for the alternative hypotheses that I described in my question. $\endgroup$ Jun 29 at 9:14
    • $\begingroup$ However, I want to know whether all 3 variables change simultaneously (but possibly differently), which, if understand correctly is not captured by the alternative hypotheses specified in my question. $\endgroup$ Jun 29 at 9:14
    • $\begingroup$ thanks @mdewey! I'll check out the package. $\endgroup$ Jun 29 at 9:15

    Your Answer

    By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

    Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.