I am studying, and am fairly new to research methods and design, and hence hope to get some guidance on my analysis plan.

I have 3 questions here, and attaching a structural model as reference.

structural model

Context: My research question aims to prove that a novel incentive scheme (which I shall call a ‘strong’ intervention), is better than a traditional scheme (‘weak’ intervention). In other words, applying X1 drives more increase in Y than X2.

I have 3 sets of participants: 1 set = strong intervention, 1 set = weak intervention, 1 set = control (i.e. no incentive scheme).


Q1: To answer my RQ, do I simply prove that the difference in means between Y (for X1 and X2) is significant? Is there any value in comparing Y_X1 and Y_Control (i.e. H1a) and Y_X2 and Y_Control (i.e. H1b), and if so, must I apply Bonferroni corrections by dividing significance level (0.05) by 3?

Q2: I intend to use a linear regression model (all assumptions satisfied, of course) to model the relationship between X1 and Y, as well as X2 and Y (i.e. H1a and H1b). When I am evaluating the effects of control variables (Age, Gender, etc.), do I need to once again “Bonferroni correct?”

Q3: I intend to use a SEM software to ‘solve’ the correlations from H2 to H5, so that I can investigate the effect that travels through the mediators. Can SEM give me the correlations for H1a and H1b as well, or do I need to do pairwise correlations to get my H1 and H1b?

Appreciate your guidance to a stats noob. Thanks!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.