2
$\begingroup$

We know that in a logit model, the coefficient $\beta_j$ for the variable $x_j$, measures the impact of the variable on the log(odds)

In order to measure the impact on the Odds, we have to consider the $\exp(\beta_j)$

Specifically, if we have that $\exp(\beta_j)=1.16$, we say that, for one unit increase of $x_j$, the odds increases 16%.

but in this formula $[ ( \exp(\beta_j)-1 ) * 100 ]$ , where does the $-1$ come from? why do we subtract $1$ from the exponential?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Does this answer your question? Converting log odds coefficients to probabilities $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 11:27
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think so (though she may very well benefit from that question). I read Jenny's question as she wants to remain in the odds metric, and wonders how one goes from "the odds ratio is 1.16" to "the odds increase by 16%" $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 20:03

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

$\exp( \beta_j )$ is the odds ratio, so for a unit change in $x_j$ we expect the odds to increase by a factor $\exp( \beta_j )$, i.e. we need to multiply the odds by that number. In your example you have an odds ratio of $1.16$. If you multiply a number with $1$ it remains the same, so anything on top of $1$ is a growth and anything below $1$ is a decrease. So if we want to focus on the change we subtract $1$. This is where the $-1$ comes from. Notice that this formula does not add any information. We can say that an odds doubles or that it has grown by 100%, and we would be saying the exact same thing. This is just about finding a representation of your results that is easiest for your audience.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.