I am still learning how to interpret the results of a Granger causality test.
Granger Causality Test: Y = f(X)
Model Res.DF Diff. DF F p-value
Complete model 1000
Reduced model 1001 -1 9.98656377696739 0.00162424264659028
Granger Causality Test: X = f(Y)
Model Res.DF Diff. DF F p-value
Complete model 1000
Reduced model 1001 -1 61.7745391599339 9.92054758804637e-15
My interpretation is that in both tests the null hypothesis is not rejected which means that both variables are likely to cause each other. Although the 2nd test is more likely to be casual because of the significantly smaller p-value. Can anyone please help me figure out if I am correct or incorrect?