1
$\begingroup$

I am defining a model on a vector, $T$, of size $n$, wherein each element $t_i \in T$ is independent and either $0$ or $1$. This model depends on 3 other parameters, $q$ (also a vector of size $n$), $\theta$, and $\phi$ (both $\theta$ and $\phi$ are vectors of size $m$). All elements of all vectors are independent. The vectors $T$ and $q$ have all been observed so I am going to assume that $P(T)=c_1$ and $P(q) = c_2$ where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are constants. Additionally, I assume a uniform prior on $\theta$, and some arbitrary prior on $\phi$ that is easy to sample from.

I define my model as follows:

\begin{align*} P\left(T\vert q,\theta,\phi\right)=\prod\limits_{k=1}^m\prod\limits_{\{i\mid h(i)=k\}}\left(q_i\theta_k\right)^{t_i}\left(1-q_i\theta_k\right)^{1-t_i}\tag{1} \end{align*} Where $h$ is some function that maps an index in $T$ to an index in $\phi$.

Since the $t_i$ are $0$ or $1$, this is essentially a product of bernoulli distributions each with a different parameter $p=q_i\theta_k$.

Ultimately, my goal is to estimate \begin{align*} P\left(\phi\vert T, q\right) \propto P\left(T\vert q,\phi\right)P\left(\phi\right)\tag{2} \end{align*}

The actual values of the $\theta$ are not relevant to me so I would like to take the marginal distribution. \begin{align*} P\left(T\vert q, \phi\right)=\prod\limits_{k=1}^m\int_1^0\prod\limits_{\{i\mid h(i)=k\}}\left(q_i\theta_k\right)^{t_i}\left(1-q_i\theta_k\right)^{1-t_i}d\theta_k\tag{3} \end{align*} This integral is quite difficult to do analytically (unless I can justify switching the order of the product and the integral) so my idea would be to try and sample directly from the distribution.

I am already doing MCMC to estimate the distribution in equation $(2)$ So I'd like to sample \begin{align*} \theta_k\sim U(0,1) \end{align*} Then plug this into equation $(1)$ and use that in my MCMC simulation for estimating equation $(2)$.

Does this sound like it would work? Is there a better way to estimate equation ${3}$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ There is no $\phi$ in (1)... $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Nov 12 '21 at 20:43
  • $\begingroup$ @Xi'an, oops. thank you for pointing that out. The $\phi$ is encoded in the limit of the left most product and also in the function $h$ that maps indices of $T$ to indices of $\phi$. I'm not sure how best to notate this relation. $\endgroup$
    – tinman248
    Nov 13 '21 at 22:25
2
$\begingroup$

Using an unbiased estimate $\hat\pi(\phi)$ of the target density $\pi(\phi)$ in a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is called the pseudo-marginal Metropolis–Hastings algorithm, first introduced by Beaumont (Genetics, 2003) and later extended by Andrieu and Roberts (Annals of Statistics, 2009). It is validated by treating $\hat\pi(\phi)$ as an auxiliary variable.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.