I am using financial stock data (1588 observations, daily returns) to estimate
a GARCH(1,1) and a GJR-GARCH(1,1) model.

A GARCH(1,1) takes the form: $\sigma_t^2 = \omega+\alpha_1 a_{t-1}^2+\beta_1\sigma_{t-1}^2$,

while a GJR-GARCH(1,1) takes the form:

$\sigma_t^2 = \omega+(\alpha_1+\gamma_1N_{t-1})a_{t-1}^2+\beta_1\sigma_{t-1}^2$, where $N_{t-1}$ is an indicator function with

$N_{t-1} = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if} \; a_{t-i} < 0, \\ 0 & \text{if} \; a_{t-i} \geq 0. \\ \end{cases}$, and $\alpha_i$,$\gamma_i$ and $\beta_j$ are non-negative parameters.

I am using the rugarch package in R to estimate the models (I assume constant mean):

spec1 = ugarchspec(variance.model = list(model = "sGARCH", garchOrder = c(1,1)), 
              mean.model = list(armaOrder = c(0,0)))
garch = ugarchfit(spec = spec1, data = data) 
spec2 = ugarchspec(variance.model = list(model = "fGARCH", garchOrder = c(1,1),
                                    submodel = "GJRGARCH"), 
              mean.model = list(armaOrder = c(0,0)))
gjr = ugarchfit(spec = spec2, data = data)

For the GARCH(1,1) model, I get following output:

Optimal Parameters
        Estimate  Std. Error  t value Pr(>|t|)
mu      0.000309    0.000305   1.0135  0.31083
omega   0.000010    0.000001   7.7836  0.00000
alpha1  0.142502    0.013095  10.8818  0.00000
beta1   0.820859    0.016215  50.6237  0.00000

Everything seems to work fine. The covariance-stationarity condition is fulfilled as $\alpha_1+\beta_1=0.9633609<1$
Naturally, this value coincides with the line of code: garch@fit$persistence.

For the GJR-GARCH(1,1), I get following output:

Optimal Parameters
    Estimate  Std. Error  t value Pr(>|t|)
mu      0.000065    0.000301  0.21742 0.827883
omega   0.000011    0.000001 14.45405 0.000000
alpha1  0.140940    0.013092 10.76573 0.000000
beta1   0.810593    0.015614 51.91367 0.000000
eta11   0.206881    0.052294  3.95610 0.000076

The covariance-stationarity condition is not fulfilled for this model as $\alpha_1+\beta_1+0.5\gamma_1=1.0549735>1$
(Note that this condition follows from the fact that I am assuming a symmetric distribution, the standard normal distribution).

My first "conflicting" result and question is:
How is it possible that the fitted GARCH(1,1) fulfills the covariance-stationarity
condition, but the GJR-GARCH(1,1) does not using the exact same data?

My second conflicting result is that if a run the line of code gjr@fit$persistence I get the value 0.9575659, which does not coincide with the "manually" calculated value of 1.0549735. The formula for the persistence of a GJR in the vignette of the rugarch package is exactly as I stated it above: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rugarch/vignettes/Introduction_to_the_rugarch_package.pdf

Does someone have a clue, where the inconsistency could come from? Thank you in advanced


1 Answer 1


There are two different parametrizations of the GJR-GARCH model in rugarch, and you're applying the formula for the persistence from one parametrization to the other.

For GJR-GARCH(1,1), the first one is the one you've shown, which in the documentation is written like this:

$$\sigma_t^2 = w + (\alpha + \gamma I_{t-1}) \varepsilon_{t-1}^2 + \beta \sigma_{t-1}^2$$

where $I_t = 1$ when $\varepsilon_t \leq 0$, and 0 otherwise.

As you say, when the standardized residuals are drawn from a symmetric distribution, the persistence is given by:

$$\alpha + \beta + \frac{1}{2}\gamma$$

There is an alternate, equivalent parametrization, which arises as a special case of the family-GARCH model, which goes like this:

$$\sigma_t^2 = w + \alpha' \sigma^2_{t-1} (|z_{t-1}|-\eta z_{t-1})^2 + \beta \sigma_{t-1}^2$$

Since the sign of $z_t$ and $\varepsilon_t$ is the same and since $\varepsilon_t = \sigma_t z_t$, you can show that this is the same as:

$$\sigma_t^2 = w + \left(\alpha'(1-\eta)^2 + \alpha'\left[(-1-\eta)^2-(1-\eta)^2\right]I_{t-1} \right)\varepsilon^2_{t-1} + \beta \sigma_{t-1}^2$$

Reading off the coefficients, we have the relationship between the two parametrizations:

$$\alpha = \alpha'(1-\eta)^2$$ $$\gamma = \alpha'\left[(-1-\eta)^2-(1-\eta)^2\right]$$

Therefore, in the second parametrization the persistence is given by:

$$\alpha'(1-\eta)^2 + \beta + \frac{1}{2}\alpha'\left[(-1-\eta)^2-(1-\eta)^2\right]$$

The more general version of this appears in the documentation you've linked to as equations 27-28.

In rugarch, the first parametrization is obtained from rugarch::ugarchspec by passing :

variance.model = list(model = "gjrGARCH", garchOrder = c(1,1))

The second, which is the one you have, by passing:

variance.model = list(model = "fGARCH", garchOrder = c(1,1), submodel = "GJRGARCH")

Plugging in your coefficient estimates (to the precision that you've displayed them), I get that the persistence of your GJR-GARCH model is $0.9575652$, which is very close to what rugarch::persistence gave you.

  • $\begingroup$ I was also wondering why I got the parameter "eta11" in the output of the GJR-GARCH(1,1), but your answer has clarified this point as well. Using the code that you stated for the first parametrization, I now get consistent results and get the parameter "gamma1" instead of "eta11" in the output of the GJR-GARCH(1,1). Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Nov 16, 2021 at 11:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.