0
$\begingroup$

Consider the simple linear regression model $ y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1{x_i} + \epsilon_i$

Suppose in an OLS, the $t$-statistic for the null hypothesis $\beta_1 = 0$ is $1.92$, what is the $F$-statistic for the overall significance of the model?

I am aware that $F$ statistic for testing exclusion of a single variable is equal to the square of the corresponding $t$ statistic: however, I can't seem to find how to link that information to this question. Am I missing information?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Consider what the null hypothesis would be for the “significance of the entire model”. $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Commented Nov 28, 2021 at 22:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh it would just be $\beta_1$ = 0, wouldn't it? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2021 at 23:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That’s what I would say, and that’s what R gives you in a “summary” of a linear model. And then the alternative hypothesis would be $\ne$. // This is a subtle point, but good for you for not writing $\hat\beta_1=0$. $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Commented Nov 28, 2021 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! I spent way too much time looking for an answer when it was sitting right in front me $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2021 at 23:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Since you pretty much solved the problem yourself, you might consider posting a self-answer. (Cross Validated does not consider it arrogant or poor etiquette to do so. In fact, I have posted several self-answers.) $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Commented Nov 28, 2021 at 23:37

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In the simple linear regression model, testing the significance of the model requires testing the hypothesis: $$H_0 \colon \beta_1 = 0 \\ H_0 \colon \beta_1 \neq 0 $$

Given that we are whether a single parameter is equal to 0, the $F$ statistic will simply equal the square of the corresponding $t$ statistic. This means that if the $t$-statistic for the null is $1.92$, the $F$-statistic will simply be $1.92^2$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not sure how this answers your question. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 29, 2021 at 15:36
  • $\begingroup$ The edit might should have made it clearer $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 29, 2021 at 17:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.